Wednesday, April 30, 2014

What types of conflict (physical, emotional, moral, intellectual, or emotional) are in the poem?

The Lady of Shallott is experiencing both types of conflict, internal, which would be emotional, as character vs. self,  and external conflict, character vs. character or the environment. 


For example, the Lady locked in the tower struggles with her emotions ranging from initial contentment with her situation to desperation to escape.  She knows, morally and intellectually, that she must not leave the tower because of the curse.  But once she sees, through her mirror, Sir Lancelot's shiny armour, and hears him singing, she makes an emotional decision to leave the tower and go to Camelot.


Immediately, the Lady knows that she is in conflict with the curse, an external conflict.  As she journeys to Camelot in her boat, the effects of the curse begin.  She slowly dies in the boat as it drifts to Camelot.  


The Lady of Shallot surrenders her intellect to emotion, making a poor decision in her internal conflict. She loses to the external conflict, the curse wins and takes her life before she sees Lancelot.  The only gain is that Lancelot looks at her in the boat, but she is already dead.

What is a Neo-Pavlovian in "Brave New World"?

Pavlov was a Russian physiologist who experimented with conditioning responses.  He rang a bell every time that he fed a dog to the point that whenever he rang this bell, the dog would salivate, thinking he would be fed.  Thus, Pavlov began the study of conditioned responses and their implications for psychology; this study is termed classical conditioning.

In "Brave New World," the castes are conditioned to think in certain ways through hypnopaedia, sleep-conditioning.  For example, Betas are taught to dislike Deltas so that they will not associate with them.  This process can also be used for counter-conditioning to get rid of unwanted behavior.  Of course, this conditioning works better in "Brave New World" because the individual differences of humans have been eliminated by the genetic engineering in the Hatchery.

Why does Buck love John Thornton above other masters in The Call of the Wild?

Buck is accepting of John Thornton because John treats Buck with love, honor and respect.  Buck had been taken from his home, abused, beaten, passed from one abusive master to another and had lost all faith in humans.  When John comes along and buys Buck from yet another abusive human he is at first very leary of John, but Buck finally learns to trust his new master and they develop a mutual respect for each other, if not complete dedication.  John does not try to keep Buck from wandering, he does not hit him, he does not starve him and he lets Buck be as free as Buck needs to be.



"Thornton "was the ideal master. Other men saw to the welfare of their dogs from a sense of duty and business expediency; he saw to the welfare of his as if they were his own children." Buck becomes his loyal friend and loves him more than any human or beast he has ever known."


In A Midsummer Night's Dream, what is the symbolic meaning of the city and the forest?

Simply put, I think the city represents the real world of pragmatism, and the forest a dream world of escapism and transformation.


What we see of Athens, the city, in the first scene is a pretty uncommunicative marriage, in which Theseus won Hippolyta with his sword, followed by the insistence on an extremely harsh law which prevents Hermia from following her heart and marrying Lysander, instead threatening her with death.


Then, once the play moves into the woods, we meet the fairies -adding a whole magical dimension to the play. Hippolyta and Theseus' suppressed unhappiness transforms into the straight-out anger of Oberon and Titania.


The forest transforms people: it transforms, courtesy of Puck's flower-squeezing with the "love-in-idleness" juice, Lysander's affections for Hermia into love for Helena, and then Demetrius' love for Hermia into love for Helena as well. Moreover, when the mechanicals (who are acting - another mode of transformation) meet up to rehearse in the forest, Bottom is transformed into a half-donkey.


Translation and transformation are everywhere. And then, when the mortals return to the city, they take back some of the goodwill and happiness they learnt in the forest. Theseus exempts Hermia from the law he insisted on in the first scene, the mechanicals perform their play, and the lovers get happily married.


Hope it helps!

What is the summary for Chapter 16 of The Kite Runner?

Rahim Khan begins by describing to Amir his desolate life in Kabul under Russian rule. He was growing old and finding it difficult to maintian Baba's large house all by himself. After Baba's death he was so overwhelmed by loneliness that he  decided to take Hassan into the house. He managed to find Hassan who was living in a village outside Bamiyan. Hassan was married and his wife, Farzana Jan, was expecting.  Hassan is saddened to hear from him that Ali had been killed by a land mine. Rahim Khan enjoys the meal cooked for him by Farzana and stays overnight. When Rahim Khan first asks Hassan to come with him to Kabul Hassan refuses saying he has settled down to a peaceful life in the village, but however the next morning he and his wife agree to come to Kabul. Hassan asks Rahim Kham many questions about Amir, and he answers him to the best of his knowledge. When Hassan hears about Baba's death he is grief stricken and cries his heart out.

When they arrive at Kabul, Hassan refuses to stay in the house saying it was a matter "ihtiram, a matter of respect,"  and moves in with his wife into the very same hut in the backyard where he was born. Hassan, then, mourned Baba's death by wearing black for forty days.

Hassan and his wife look after the house with great care as though they were expecting Amir to arrive from America any moment. Farzana gives birth to a still born girl child and is heartbroken. However, in early 1990, she becomes pregnant again. In the summer of that year Sanaubar, Hassan's mother makes a sudden appearance. She was once very attractive but now she is scarred beyond recognition, the victim of a brutal knife attack.She had eloped with a band of travelling singers and dancers in 1964 soon after giving birth to Hassan,without even holding him. Sanaubar is gradually nursed back to health and in course of time Hassan forgives her and is reconciled to her. In the winter of 1990 Sanaubar delivers Hassan's son, Sohrab.  She and her grandson became very fond of one another: "the two of them were inseaparable." When Sohrab was four years old, Sanaubar died in her sleep.

In due course Hassan taught his son Sohrab, to be a kite runner. The Taliban,however, banned kite fighting shortly after taking power in 1996.  The Taliban fighters indulged in ethnic cleansing and massacred the Hazaras in Mazar-i-Sharif.

What is the climax and resolution of A Christmas Carol?

The climax of any piece of literature is the highest point of interest (not action) wherein the reader understands how the story will resolve (and to what extent the beginning balance is either regained or destroyed.)


In order to determine the climax, then, for A Christmas Carol, the reader must define the main, dominating idea or theme of the work. What is Dickens' message? The notes linked below offer three thematic ideas that work together to provide Dickens' most probable dominant theme: reconciliation and restoration to relationship are always possible, as long as life endures.


Knowing this, the climax of the story occurs when Scrooge asks the final spectre if the shadows of Christmas yet-to-come are only shadows, and not certainties. The reader understands at that point that Scrooge is a changed (or at least changing) man. The remainder of the book illustrates this conversion in a light and entertaining way. Even the mood of the text works to demostrates the truth of Scrooge's transformation.

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Which element(s) is/are NOT characteristic of a gothic novel? Here are the elements:(i) Castles and graveyards(ii) No supernatural images(iii) A...

I think the one you're looking to eliminate from that list is "no supernatural images". Gothic novels tend to be packed full of images and figures of the supernatural, as well as with the supernatural itself.

Gothic novels - Shelley's "Frankenstein", or (that most famous of Gothic novels) Walpole's "The Castle of Otranto" are two good examples - are fascinated with the supernatural: ghosts, monsters, spirits, life after death.

Do you think Jane Austen in "Pride & Prejudice" is more successful in presenting the male or female characters?Could you support your answer by...

Jane Austen is equally adept at creating both male and female characters. The two important features which help to determine her characterisation skills are:


1. The characters must be well 'rounded' individuals.  The novelist must reveal to us as many facets as possible of the character. Collins, for instance, is a character who has been introduced in the novel by Jane Austen to satirize patriarchal and  male chauvinistic attitudes prevalent in her society. However, he is not a 'flat' character like the characters of Jonsonian Comedy. In the first paragraph of Ch.15, Jane Austen gives a detailed description of Collins which helps us to visualize all the multiple and contradictory dimensions of his personality: "made him altogether a mixture of pride and obsequiousness, self-importance and humility."


Darcy, is another 'round' male character. We learn about the different dimensions of his personality from his housekeeper Mrs. Reynolds' conversation with Elizabeth and her aunt and uncle at Pemberley in Ch.43.


Similarly, for the female characters the five Bennett girls are  presented as well rounded indiviuals. Jane Austen takes great pains to emphasize the uniqueness of each of the girls.


2. Consistency: The action  of the character must match his or her description. For instance at the end of the first chapter, Mr. Bennet is described as being "capricious."  This is proved by the fact that although Mr.Bennet first refused to call upon Bingley, he later visited Bingley without informing his family. In Ch.15 Jane Austen describes Collins as being "not a sensible man." Throughout the novel all of Collins' actions prove that he is a very stupid man.


Charlotte remarks in Ch.6 "it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom your are to pass your life." True to this remark of hers she marries Collins hastily.


Similarly, Jane is described by Elizabeth in Ch.4 thus, "all the world are good and agreeable in your eyes.  I never heard you speak ill of a human being in my life." In the whole novel she is the only person who does not judge Wickham harshly.

Calculate the length of the altitude through A of an isosceles triangle in which AB=AC=26 cm and BC=20 cm.

The straight line down from the tip to the middle of the base makes a right triangle with the little bottom side measuring 10 and the hypotenuse, the angley side, measuring still what it is, 26.  Bummer it's not a 3, 4, 5 triangle, but anyway, all you have to do is plug the numbers into the Pythagorean theorem and solve.  But 10 and 26 are pretty big numbers, so I'd first divide both by two, making them 5 and 13 and then solve the problem 13 squared = 5 squared + what squared? 


169 = 25 + x squared


169 -25 = x squared


144 = x squared (o thank gosh, an easy square!)


so x = the square root of 144, 12.


But then remember to multiply it back up (because you halved the sides to make getting the answer easier). 


So 12 x 2 = 24.


So the altitude is 24.


Now I'm going to see if 24's what the other answerer got, just a sec . . .


Yes!  cool.  not to shabby for an English teacher, eh?

Monday, April 28, 2014

How do Saki's adjective phrases about the setting in "The Interlopers" create tension?

Most of Saki's adjective phrases in "The Interlopers" advance the idea of conflict between the two main characters, George and Ulrich.  Here are several examples:


1. In the opening sentence, Saki describes the setting as a "forest of mixed growth," demonstrating that the woods are so tangled and varied, that it is difficult to tell which part belongs to whom and also to be able to distinguish between friend or foe.


2. In the first and second paragraphs, the author further describes the woods as "dark," as a "narrow strip of precipitous woodland," and "jealously guarded."  These phrases add to the idea that the two men's hatred for one another shows the dark side of human nature and that both are walking a dangerous (precipitous) path to letting their hatred destroy themselves.


3.  Near the end of the story, the forest is "cold" and "gloomy." The hatred between the two men has dissipated at this point, and they are fueled only by a desire to escape.  The gloominess of the blustery, fitful setting portends an unhappy ending for Georg and Ulrich.

What does the following quote mean: "It is not what an author says, but what he or she whispers, that is important." and support 2 short stories.

What is unstated by the author is of more importance than what is overtly stated.  Afterall, most of the time, the reader must infer what the theme of a narrative is.  So, it is the suggestions of the various elements--setting, character, point of view, plot--that declare the most important message.

In Joseph Conrad's "The Secret Sharer," for example, the captain of a ship stows away in his own cabin a man who swims to his boat in the dark, a man whose physical appearance is much like his.  Even though he has broken the law by harboring a man who has admitted to murder, the captain continues to hide his "secret sharer" because of some immediate affinity that he feels for the other, referring to him as his "double," with whom "a mysterious communication was established immediately.  While never stating that the captain has sensed isolation before and now has meaning in his life from sharing it with another, Conrad has "whispered" this to his reader.

Likewise, in William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily," the reader determines from the "whispered" inferences of character that Emily, who has become an anachronism in her town, seeks to rebuff the new world into which she is thrown by retaining as much of the old that she can.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

What does Patrick Henry warn the colonists about? What does he urge the colonists to do?

Patrick Henry was an anti-federalist and he gave a lot of speeches and wrote many papers that extolled the virtues of a confederation. In a confederation, the states have sovereignty. Those speeches, which occurred almost immediately after the Constitution was ratified, is where his warnings can be understood.


Henry, like all anti-federalists, believed that a strong federal government would strip the people and the states of their rights and freedoms. Henry warns that the position of president, the roles of which are pretty vague in the Constitution, could easily morph into a monarch. The monarchy, or parliamentary monarchy more specifically, is the form of government that Americans had just shed blood to break free from. Patrick Henry believed that with the endorsement of a Constitution that gave significant power to a central government, the possibility existed that this same body would usurp this power through taxation and other means. In other words, the Americans would have traded a tyrant an ocean away for one that existed on the same continent.

In "To Kill a Mockingbird", what is the effect of Calpurnia on Scout, and why is this effect important?

Because Scout has no mother, and she runs "wild," as stated by Mrs. Dubose, Cal creates a sense of rules and regulations. It is not odd that during this time in the South the "help" would teach manners to the young and teach the basic principles of their culture (even if they were from different races). Many families allowed the nanny to raise children--and most were African-American nannies, or "mammies."

Calpurnia can scold and even spank Scout, which is something that Atticus rarely does. He explains the world, but he doesn't really have time for child rearing.

What are the exposition, rising action, climax and falling action in "The Tell-Tale Heart"?

Exposition is the part of the story that sets up the rest of the story. It usually introduces us to the characters and settings of the story to follow. In "The Tell-Tale Heart," we meet the narrator and the old man, and we see that the setting is the apartment of the narrator. We also see that the narrator insists that he is not insane, but we can tell from the beginning that he is not sane at all. He tells us that he is not insane, and then tells us he loved the old man and didn't want to kill him. 


The rising action of the story occurs when there is some kind of obstacle standing in the way of the outcome of the story. Here the rising action occurs when the narrator goes into the old man's room for seven nights. He wants to kill the man, because he thinks his blue hazy eye can see the inside of the narrator. Each night when he goes to kill the man, the man's eye is open, making the narrator think the old man is watching him.


The climax of a story is usually the most intense part of the story. Here the climax occurs when the narrator kills the old man. He thinks that once he has killed him the old man will not be able to see him anymore. 


The falling action of a story comes right after the climax. The falling action ties everything up and ends the story. Here the falling action occurs when the narrator "hears" the old man's heart beating, although he has just killed him. The police are talking to the narrator, and he hears the beating of the dead man's heart getting louder and louder. The narrator finally admits to what he has done and tells the police to tear up the floorboards to find the "beating heart."

In "How I Met My Husband," why is there no description of Chris Watters's personal appearance? To Edie, what matters the most about him?

Edie "tries on" a relationship with Chris Watters in much the same way she tries on Mrs. Pebbles satin dress. She is a girl growing up, awakening and searching for her life. She has no experience with men. The young pilot and war veteran is romantic and exciting, although Edie certainly is not used to the attention he pays to her. When they first meet and he compliments her appearance in Mrs. Pebbles' dress, Edie feels very uncomfortable and wishes only that he would leave. Then she must see him about keeping the secret of the dress. This meeting leads to a cake, which leads to a passionate kiss, and Edie is completely and naively smitten. His promise to write to her leads Edie to believe he will be her future, a far more exciting prospect than living on the farm or performing Mrs. Pebbles' household chores.


It is not how Chris looks that draws Edie in; it is what he manages to do in the short time he is with her. He makes Edie feel mature and desirable, a young woman with a romantic future ahead of her. Edie is a desirable young woman with a romance in her future, but she must let go of her first love to find her real one.

What is the summary for Chapter 13 of The Kite Runner?

 The "Lafz" or the ceremony of "giving word" takes place in the General's house, with Baba formally requesting that the two families be united and the General  declaring, "we are honoured that your family and ours will be joined."  The "Shirini-Khori" or  the "Eating of the Sweets" ceremony is cancelled and the engagement period is curtailed because of Baba's sickness. Consequently Amir and Soraya never go out alone before their marriage. For the "awroussi" or the wedding ceremony Baba spent $35,000-almost all his savings. During the wedding ceremony Amir wonders whether Hassan was also married. By the time the celebrations are over it is almost daybreak. Amir remarks "that  night, I discovered the tenderness of a woman."

Soraya moves in with Amir and Baba because Baba is so sick. She takes responsibility for Baba’s care and nurses him devotedly. He dies one month later in his sleep. At Baba's funeral Amir is desolate and remarks, "Baba couldn't show me the way anymore. I'd have to find it on my own. The thought of it terrified me."  Fortunately for him, Soraya hugs him and comforts him when he begins to cry. 

After Baba's death they move to a single bedroom apartment in Fremont. He sells Baba's old VW bus and stops going to the flea market. The General presents Amir with an IBM typewriter as a housewarming gift. The couple settles into a routine.  Both of them enrol at San Jose State University. Amir as an English Major student and Soraya in the teaching track. Her father objects to her becoming a teacher but she determinedly remarks, "teaching may not pay much, but it's what I want to do."

Amir finishes his first novel ("a father-son story set in Kabul")  in 1988. The book is released the following year and Amir becomes "a minor celebrity in the Afghan community." Amir remembers Hassan’s belief in his talent and ability for creative writing.

The couple try to conceive for one year. They are unsuccessful and try in-vitro fertilization but to no avail. They consider adoption but Soraya's father does not approve saying, "blood is a powerful thing, Bachem, and when you adopt you don't know whose blood you are bringing into the house," and so they decide not to adopt. However, the childlessness affects their intimacy: "it had seeped into our marriage, that emptiness, into our laughs and our lovemaking."

In "The Crucible", what quote did Proctor use to help Mary remain brave?

Proctor brought Mary Warren to the courts to tell the judges that "it were all pretense", meaning, the girls were all pretending, and never saw any spirits.  Mary was terrified, because she knew that at any moment the girls could turn on her and accuse her of witchcraft.  Abby had already outright threatened them in Act One:  "I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you."

So, she spent a week gathering the courage to even come to the court, and once there, she was so terrified that Proctor told her, "Do that which is good and no harm shall come to thee", a quote from the angel Raphael to the boy Tobias.  And, to give her credit, she tried, she really did.  Unfortunately,Proctor's words of comfort didn't hold, and she chickened out in the end and turned on him.

Saturday, April 26, 2014

How are the lower class in "Twelfth Night" conveyed?for example feste

In Shakespeare's time, social status was incredibly important. The Elizabethan Age was a time of progress, and while there were still large differences in social class, people were beginning to have some hope of increasing their station. In Twelfth Night, there are many characters who are interested in increasing their social standing, such as Malvolio and Maria.

Malvolio is the the opposite of Feste -- Malvolio wears dark clothing and has no sense of humor, while Feste is the court jester and always has a festive air about him. When Maria forges the letter from Olivia to Malvolio, making Malvolio believe Olivia loves him, Malvolio ends up looking like a fool by wearing ridiculous clothing and acting inappropriately. Even though the two characters are initially completely different from each other, they are both members of a lower social class, and they both end up playing the role of a fool.

What is the plot for the false gems?

If you are referring to the plot of "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the story is about a young woman who is not satisfied with the money her husband earns. One day, they are both invited to a ball and the woman borrows what she thinks is a very valuable necklace from a friend to wear to the ball. However, at some point, she looses the necklace and is afraid to tell her friend she lost it. So her husband borrows a great deal of money and buys a copy of the necklace, which she returns to her friend. After years of hard work trying to pay off the debt for the necklace, she runs into her old friend. Her friend reveals that the necklace she loaned the woman was really made of fake jewels and, therefore, the woman's hard work has been for nothing. More information on the story can be found at the links listed below.

Friday, April 25, 2014

How does "The Little Prince" end?

In "The Little Prince" the prince has learned that the heart is important in recognizing the things that really matter in life, he is still sad. The prince is lonely and yearns for his rose. The prince fails to see that it is his love which makes the rose special. This love also binds him to the rose. 

Toward the end of the story, the prince and narrator go find a well. After they find the well and are quenched by the waters, they come to realize that people often forget what really matters in life. The prince then plans with the snake for the prince's return to his planet. Even though the pilot fixes the prince's plane, the snake bites the prince. This severity of the act is emphasized by the prince falling to the sand, but in silence.

The next day the narrator does not find the prince. Perhaps, the prince has made his way to his asteroid, thinks the narrator. In the stars, the narrator believes that he can hear the laughter of the prince. The stars, or this hope, is what eases the narrator's mind.

Still, the narrator begins to despair and worries about the prince and even his flower. He wonders if the sheep he drew ate the prince's rose. This makes the narrator sad since he knew the importance of this little flower to his friend the prince. What if the prince were to not find the rose, this would be sad indeed. At the end of the story, the narrator even calls upon the reader to help in the search of the prince.

In A Christmas Carol, how does Scrooge react to Tiny Tim's death?

The Ghost of Christmas Present shows Scrooge the Cratchit family's present Christmas and predicts that future holiday celebrations will be minus Tiny Tim.  The boy will die if the Cratchit family's life does not change in the future. 


Scrooge is enchanted by Tiny Tim. The author tells us that he looks at him throughout this visit.  He doesn't take his eyes off the small boy who loves life, even in his physically disabled condition.  Scrooge is a miserable and lonely man who has everything compared to the Cratchit family, yet he is fascinated by Tiny Tim's simple joy.



 "I see a vacant seat," replied the Ghost, "in the poor chimney-corner, and a crutch without an owner, carefully preserved. If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, the child will die.'' (Dickens) 




"No, no,'' said Scrooge. "Oh, no, kind Spirit! say he will be spared.'' (Dickens) 




"If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, none other of my race,'' returned the Ghost, "will find him here. What then? If he be like to die, he had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.''  (Dickens)




Scrooge hung his head to hear his own words quoted by the Spirit, and was overcome with penitence and grief.  (Dickens)



In the above passages, Scrooge is deeply saddened by the possibility of Tiny Tim's death.  He feels ashamed by his words that are thrust back at him by The Ghost of Christmas Present. 

What did President FDR do in his first 100 days in office?

Roosevelt began office when America was scared and extremely panicked. A very famous passage by Arthur Schlesinger about the mood before FDR took office reads as follows:  

It was now a matter of seeing whether a representative democracy could conquer economic collapse. It was a matter of staving off violence - even, some though - revolution.

Rather like incoming President Obama, FDR's first job was to try and stabilise a very instable economy. The day after his speech (March 5) he declared a bank holiday, closing the banks until stability could be regained.

He also got the "Emergency Banking Bill" through Congress very easily, and, the soundest banks reopened on March 12, and quickly regained stability.

Hoover had allowed two previous bank panics to continue uninterrupted, which had provoked economic disaster - and, understandably, Roosevelt's intervention hugely aided his reputation and popularity.

Roosevelt's "New Deal" next set about to provide money and relief for the poorest citizens, and to stabilise the nation's economy so that it could withstand panics again in the future. In his first 100 days, he submitted a huge number of bills to Congress, mainly aimed at providing relief to the poor, all of which passed.

These included the creation of the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

In "The Tell-Tale Heart" what might the vulture's eye symbolize?

Perhaps the vulture eye is an omen, reflective of what is to happen to the narrator.  For, the narrator declares, "Whenever it fell upon me my blood ran cold." And, so, the narrator becomes disturbed in a cold premonition of evil to come.  Thus, he creates a rational for killing the old man whom, he declares, he loves. He must be rid of the eye to which he ascribes evil:  "For it was not the old man who vexed me, but his Evil Eye."

In his stories Poe applied a technique which he termed "arabesque."  This arabesque is a twisting and turning of details in a horrific way.  In "The Tell-Tale Heart," it is, indeed, the heart that tattles on the evil-doer.  However, rather than being the heart of the victim as the narrator imagines, it is the beating of his own heart that the narrator hears, his own conscience which he tries to silence long before the murder. This guilt is what causes the narrator's "blood to run cold" in the beginning when he sees the vulture's eye.  For, in an arabesque, the narrator sees already reflected in the eye the murder which he will later commit.  That is, he sees in the vulture eye of death, the evil which his soul already knows before the deed.

In Chapter 4 of Lord of the Flies, who "still felt the unease of wrongdoing" and who was affected by the "taboo of the old life?"

After Roger destroys the sand castles of the Littluns, it is Maurice that feels something about the "unease of wrongdoing" and runs off into the woods, feeling uncomfortable about what they've done.  He doesn't like what they've done and his guilt makes him ashamed.


But Roger sticks around, not really feeling too bad about what he's done.  He is the one that begins to feel some pleasure about doing things the young kids don't like or hurting them, but he feels some "taboo of the old life" and it prevents him from actually hitting the boys with the rocks he is throwing.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Who invented the olympic gold medal?

An Olympic Gold medal is referring to the first place award in the modern Olympic Games. Medals were not awarded at the ancient games.. In beginning in 1896 winners received a silver medal and the second place winner received a bronze medal.   Beginning in 1900 most winners received a trophy instead of a medal. The tradition of receiving the sequence of gold, silver and bronze medals, for the first through third place winner, began in 1904.  The minting of the specific medals is up to the host city.  From 1928-1968, the design was exactly the same: the obverse showed a generic design by Florentine artist Giuseppe Cassioli with the text giving the host city; the reverse showing a generic design of an Olympic champion.  From 1972-2000, Cassioli's design remained on the obverse with a custom design by the host city on the reverse. A new obverse design was commissioned for the Games in Athens, in 2004, games.

What are the themes and symbols in the Sister Carrie novel?

G)Lack of communication
The failure of the characters to communicate with words is a recurring theme in this novel. This is most evident in the relationship between Hurstwood and Carrie as only the readers are made privy to their thought processes. They are unable to express their full views of each other and this may be interpreted as an attempt to reflect how little we know of our friends, partners and ourselves. A useful example of this may be found when Hurstwood fishes for words when trying to express his affection for Carrie, and finds instead that words fail him. Language is seen to be an inadequate means to articulate emotions.


By contrasting the characters’ thoughts with what they say, the narrative also exposes the gap between expression and the unconscious. By recording what they are thinking, it is also possible to see, on a simplified level, an echo of how quickly we change our minds.


H)Material possessions
Carrie’s fear of poverty and desire for material possessions are the only two factors which disturb her from her passivity. Consumerism often dominates her decisions as she is mainly characterized by her love of new clothes and need for comfort.


Interestingly, the narrative does not condemn her for this predilection. She and Drouet represent polar opposites of the puritan work ethic as they prefer finery and living for the moment. Although she is not punished by the author for her extravagant tastes, and is a likeable figure at times, she is never given a great amount of depth. Her encounters with Ames teach her that desire for wealth will lead to dissatisfaction, and she considers him as wise for holding such views, but it is not until the end that she appears to ponder these thoughts more closely. For this reason, it is possible to see that through Carrie Dreiser is attempting to convey a convincing human rather than a good or evil main protagonist. Carrie’s desires are recognizable, as is her sense of melancholy when the desires are fulfilled.


I)Social standing
It is suggested in the narrative that Hurstwood’s fall from grace into eventual suicide has partially come about because of his loss of social standing. In a society that overvalues appearance and the appearance of money, he gradually becomes ousted from his position of respectability. Through necessity and apathy he begins to wear his old clothes whilst living with Carrie and this symbolizes his decline into being a nonentity.


As his position weakens, Carrie’s is seen to strengthen as she acquires independence and a level of wealth and is metaphorically accepted back into the fold when Mrs Vance visits her in her dressing room. It is of interest that Carrie is allowed to succeed and achieve such acceptance, as a so-called fallen woman, because such women are traditionally punished in literature (remembering Eve, Madame Bovary and Anna Karenina). This novel may be regarded, therefore, as challenging the moral codes of the late nineteenth century because of she is depicted as rising, rather than declining, in perceived value.


By contrasting Carrie and Hurstwood’s change in fortune, their separate lives become all the more pronounced. Her newly acquired fame is emphasized in relation to his eventual suicide. The novel’s use of contrasts depends on the relativity of meaning, and so employs the same technique of defining by comparison as the city dwellers who are under observation.

In the poem "The Raven" by Poe, is there really a raven in the speaker's chambers? Why or why not?Comes from the poem "The Raven" by Edgar Allan Poe.

Your question can be answered in two different ways.


Yes, there is a real raven and it really can talk. At least it can say one word. It may have gotten lost in the storm somehow and was seeking shelter in a human domicile, indicating that it was probably a pet. The poem calls for "a willing suspension of disbelief." We are supposed to believe everything in "The Raven" is true and is really happening, and even to believe that the raven is still sitting on the bust of Pallas casting his shadow on the floor.


No, there is no real raven. Nothing in the poem is really and truly "real." Everything is entirely imaginary because it is, like Poe's short stories, a work of creative imagination. Poe himself explained how he composed the poem out of thin air, so to speak, and even why he chose to write about a lost love and to give her the name Lenore. He probably poured real emotions into a totally imaginary poetic narrative.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

How does the French and Indian War and Metacom relate to the struggle for supremacy in North America?

Metacom, a Native American also known as King Phillip by the English settlers, began a revolt known as King Phillip's War against the English settlers in the 1670's, attempting to drive them out of what is current day southwestern Massachusetts.  His alliance of various tribes broke down, however; the English prevailed and Native American political power was forever destroyed in the region, allowing the increasing number of English colonists to expand at will.  About eighty years later, the English, settling west from the coast, and the French, settling south from Canada, began to fight over the fur trade in what today is western Pennsylvania / Ohio. The French sought allies with the various Native tribes, but again the English prevailed militarily, and the French, as well as Spanish, were effectively driven from North America, leaving England the sole European power on the continent. 

In Chapter 16, what is Bilbo's reasoning for giving Bard and the others the Arkenstone?

Bilbo gives the Arkenstone of Thrain, 'the Heart of the Mountain', to Bard to aid him in his bargaining with Thorin.  Bilbo recognizes the importance of the jewel, telling Bard that "it is also the heart of Thorin.  He values it above a river of gold" (244).  Bilbo does not take this action lightly, or chooses to give the stone away in some misguided effort to anger Thorin; rather he bestows the gem upon the Bard and the Elven-king in hopes that the Bard will be able to use it as a bargaining chip, enabling them to end the stand-off between the dwarves, men, and elves.


Bilbo points out that "winter is coming on fast," and all the involved members of the conflict will be dealing with "snow and what not and supplies will be difficult--even for elves" (243).  To say that Bard and the Elven-king are surprised by Bilbo's actions would be an understatement, and they cannot help but question his motives. 


Bilbo explains himself simply. Besides his worries about the weather, he informs them:



"Personally, I am tired of the whole affair.  I wish I was back in the West in my own home, where folks are more reasonable.  But I have an interest in this matter--one fourteenth share, to be precise" (243).



The hobbit firmly believes that without some outside involvement in the negotiations, that Thorin is "quite ready to sit on a heap of gold and starve" (243).  Bilbo gives the Arkenstone to Bard, out of a sincere desire to help.  Later, Gandalf, who secretly listened to the entire exchange, commends Bilbo's actions, saying: "There is always more about you than anyone expects!" (245)

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Would things have turned out better if Mr. and Mrs. White had phrased the second wish more carefully in the story "The Monkey's Paw"?

No, the monkey's paw was an instrument of dark magic, designed to bring misery to any greedy human who dared try to achieve personal gain through its use. 

It is clear from the previoius owners, both the first owner, whose third wish was for death and Sergeant Major Morris that the act of wishing in itself brings with it severe and tragic consequences.

The lesson that should have been clear to the Whites after hearing the stories from Sergeant Major Morris, is that wishing will bring more harm than good. 

The Whites could not have gained anything but misery and sorrow by using the monkey's paw that was its intended goal.

In The Great Gatsby, what do the eyes of T.J. Eckleburg mean?

One of the motifs in the novel is that of moral judgment. Nick introduces this idea immediately in Chapter I when he explains that he grew up not judging others. Before the end of his introduction, however, Nick makes it clear that after coming back from the East, he had made a definite moral judgment concerning Gatsby and what "preyed" on him.


The eyes of T.J. Eckleburg on the old billboard overlooking the Valley of Ashes continue this motif. Inanimate and unseeing, they watch wordlessly over events as they unfold at Wilson's garage. Eckleburg sees all but judges nothing. This does not imply, however, that no judgment will be forthcoming.


The introduction of Owl Eyes later in the novel is suggestive of Eckleburg's eyes. Gatsby's guest, referred to as the "owl-eyed" man, wears the same style of round glasses as Eckleburg. At Gatsby's pitifully small funeral, Owl Eyes arrives unexpectedly. Standing in the rain, he makes a moral judgment in summing up the tragedy of Gatsby's life and his death. Owl Eyes calls Gatsby "The poor son-of-a-bitch." If Eckleburg could have spoken, considering what he had observed in the Valley of Ashes, he would have reached the same conclusion.

In Act 1, scene 5, after Lady MacBeth reads the letter, what is her opinion of MacBeth and how does she plan to help him?

Lady MacBeth reads the letter from her husband which relates what he has learned from the witches. After she finishes the letter, she reflects upon the character of MacBeth, fearing that his nature is "too full o'th'milk of human kindness" to do what is expedient.  While MacBeth has ambition, he is "without the illness should attend it"; he does not possess the coldness and wickedness to take the swift, direct path to the achievement of his goal.  Lady MacBeth decides to

pour my spirits in thine ear,

 And chastise with the valor of my tongue

All that impedes thee from  the golden round

That is, she vows to influence MacBeth with her own wickedness and exigency ("...I feel now/the future in the instant") so that he may earn the crown ("golden round") and become king.  These words and Lady MacBeth's speech later in this scene in which she "unsexes" herself by abandoning the feminine characteristics of compassion and tenderness indicate her disturbing change to an evil entity.

What is an example of imagery from each scene in Act five of Macbeth?

Firstly, one needs to define the term in order to establish what one needs to look for. On a very basic level, imagery refers to the descriptions a writer uses to appeal to our physical senses. We should see, hear, feel, smell and taste what the author or the characters experience. In literature and poetry, imagery is much more complex and involves the use of figures of speech to appeal to the senses and even enhance the experience being described.


In each of the eight scenes of Act 5, Shakespeare utilizes a variety of figures of speech to appeal to our senses. In scene 1, the focus is on Lady Macbeth and her mental condition. When we first encounter her, she says the following:



Yet here's a spot.



and:



Out, damned spot! out, I say!



The 'spot' lady Macbeth sees is imaginary and symbolizes her guilt for the murder of King Duncan. It is a metaphor for her remorse in having committed such a heinous crime. Her trauma is later emphasized when she cries out:



Here's the smell of the blood still: all the
perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little
hand. Oh, oh, oh!



The use of exaggeration in this instance informs of the overwhelming regret she is feeling at this point. Lady Macbeth eventually commits suicide for she cannot bear the pain of her sin any longer.


In scene two, when Angus comments about Macbeth's current situation, he effectively uses metaphor and simile to describe what the tyrant is experiencing:



Now does he feel
His secret murders sticking on his hands;
Now minutely revolts upbraid his faith-breach;
Those he commands move only in command,
Nothing in love: now does he feel his title
Hang loose about him, like a giant's robe
Upon a dwarfish thief. 



The metaphor in line two succinctly describes Macbeth's perfidy. Just like Lady Macbeth's 'spot', it is as if he cannot wash the blood of those he murdered from his hands. It is an unforgivable sin that he has committed. The fact that he feels his title 'hang loose' is metaphoric of the fact that Macbeth is losing control and his grip on those who once were loyal to him. The simile, 'like a giant's robe', emphasizes the point. Macbeth's lust for power has overwhelmed him and it has become an ill-fitting garb. He has metaphorically been dwarfed by his own power and ambition - he cannot sustain or maintain it any longer.


Scene three depicts both Macbeth's stubborn resolve and later, his anxiety:



... I cannot taint with fear...



The metaphor he uses refers to the fact that he cannot be fearful. Macbeth still believes in the witches' predictions and resolves that he therefore cannot be overcome by fear for any man for, 'none of woman born shall harm Macbeth.' later though, Macbeth states:



I have lived long enough: my way of life
Is fall'n into the sear, the yellow leaf;



Macbeth realizes that his rule and the tyranny he has maintained has degraded and he uses a metaphor to compare his rule to a leaf which has turned yellow and is dying. He now accepts the fact that his tyranny is almost over. 


In scene four, Macduff uses appropriate metaphors to describe what has to be done:



Let our just censures
Attend the true event, and put we on
Industrious soldiership.



What he means is that their justified disapproval of Macbeth's tyranny should drive them on to deal with the removal of the tyrant (the true event). They must now become true, hardworking soldiers to remove Macbeth.


In scene five, upon hearing about his wife's death, Macbeth utters a remarkably poignant metaphor:



Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.



The brevity of life is compared to that of a candle. Macbeth, through an extended metaphor also explains how meaningless life is and that our existence is shallow for we only put on a show and we do it all for nothing. He compares us to inept actors who play our roles badly, presenting ourselves in a foolish manner - all a purposeless exercise.


Scene six signifies Macduff's determination:



Make all our trumpets speak; give them all breath,
Those clamorous harbingers of blood and death.



Once again, a metaphor is used. Macduff asks that the soldiers blow their trumpets at full volume and compares them to messengers who loudly proclaim tidings of slaughter and execution, in this instance, the death of Macbeth and his supporters. 


In scene seven, the older Siward informs Malcolm that they are on the verge of success in the battle against the tyrant, Macbeth:



... The day almost itself professes yours,
And little is to do.



he uses personification. It is as if the day itself (an allusion to the battle), has declared Malcolm's victory. There is little more to achieve to ensure success.


In the final scene, Macduff provides Macbeth with a shocking revelation:



Despair thy charm;
And let the angel whom thou still hast served
Tell thee, Macduff was from his mother's womb
Untimely ripp'd.



The witches had previously informed Macbeth that 'no man of woman born shall harm Macbeth.' Macduff has just informed him that he has been 'untimely ripped' from his mother's womb. The image is brutally descriptive of the fact that he had been prematurely cut from his mother's womb and had therefore not been born through natural process. Macbeth finally realizes that he had been deceived by the witches and curses them for such wicked duplicity. He refuses to surrender and bow to Malcolm's authority. Macduff kills him and then presents his head to Malcolm later.    

What is paraphrase about The Eagle by Lord Tennyson?

A complete paraphrase of the this short poem could be the following:



He clasps the crag with crooked hands;


Close to the sun in lonely lands,


Ringed with the azure world, he stands.



There is a lone eagle on the top of a rock outcropping who is grabbing that rock with strong claws while he surveys the land. Because I am looking up at the eagle it appears very close to the sun overhead and the bright blue sky is glowing around him.



The wrinkled sea beneath him crawls:


He watches from his mountain walls,


And like a thunderbolt he falls.



From the eagles perspective up on the mountain wall it appears that the water down below is wrinkly as the waves wash to shore.  Once he decides to move he takes off with the swiftness and power of a thunderbolt.


The poem does a masterful job of capturing the majestic beauty of an eagle in this setting. Tennyson uses a short iambic tetrameter line with a clear, strong rhyme scheme to unify each image, and he uses alliteration, assonance, consonance, imagery, and figurative language to create this vision.




Who is to be blamed for the tragic flaw in "Hamlet"? I need an explanation, too.

You first need to identify the tragic flaw.  Most would say that Hamlet's flaw was that he waited so long to carry out his ghost-father's request: to kill Claudius.  Hamlet is asked in Act 1, sc. 5, by the ghost to carry out revenge against Claudius because Claudius killed King Hamlet.  Hamlet doesn't do this until the end of Act 5, which is several months later (probably about 6 or more months).  While he hesitates in carrying out this revenge, several people die: Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes, and Gertrude.  If Hamlet would have killed Claudius shortly after talking to the ghost and without involving others, none of those other characters would have had to die.  Of course, the hesitation led to Hamlet's own death as well.  Who is to blame for this tragic flaw?  Hamlet is probably to blame since he is the one who hesitates.  His hesitation though is based on his doubts, in large part.  He decides to have the traveling players perform a play he's written that depicts the killing as described to him by the ghost.  He figures if Claudius reacts, then the ghost was telling the truth.  Later, he has a chance to kill Claudius when Claudius is in the chapel praying, but he doesn't because he doesn't want Claudius to be absolved of his sins as he dies because King Hamlet, killed in his sleep, never got that chance.  Then Hamlet is sent to England and is gone for a short time.  All of these reasons for being slow have a justification to them, so blame is hard to assign.

Explain "The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but the one who causes the darkness." (Les Misérables)

This line is from chapter four of Book I in "Les Miserables," the words of Monsier Charles Francois-Bienvenu Myrial, Bishop of D-. Hugo describes him as "having a strange and peculiar way of judging things.  I suspect that he acquired it from the Gospel."  The bishop is described further as being "indulgent towards women, and towards the poor, upon whom the weight of society falls most heavily," and he says that the faults of these people



are the faults of their husbands, fathers, and masters, of the strong, the rich, and the wise.



The bishop continues to say



Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is culpable in not providing instruction for all, and it must answer for the night which it produces.  If the soul is left in darkness, sins will be committed.  The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness



The "darkness," then is the lack of instruction and its resulting knowledge which can lead people to do the right thing.  Much like Charles Dickens, an English contemporary of his, Victor Hugo felt that society itself was at times a prison.  He felt that he must expose the "degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of woman by starvation and the dwarfing of children by physical and spiritual night..."


In "Les Miserables," Jean Valjean, released from prison with a yellow identification card, seeks work.  However, he cannot find any since he is rejected as soon as he shows his card. After the bishop takes the wretched Valjean in for the night, the ex-criminal steals the silver candlesticks of the bishop.  Realizing that Valjean has stolen out of desperation and the "darkness" of his soul, the bishop tells the police that he has given these candlesticks to Valjean. Thus, the bishop takes Valjean out of the "darkness" and teaches him the lesson of love that Jean Valjean never forgets.

What are the characteristics of Mr. and Mrs. Radley in "To Kill a Mockingbird"? (Physical and mental traits.)

Since none of the characters ever speak with the Radley's directly, it's only assumption that we can go on.  Since the Radley's are "Foot Washin' Baptists" that means that "anything pleasurable is a sin."  They do not go out much, they forbid their son to go out because of his mistakes in his youth, and the only person ever seen out is Mr. Radley.  He is only seen coming back with a bag of groceries once in a while.  After that, the only time they were seen leaving was when they were taken away in death.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Will a 12x18x2 cake with a 10-inch square cake on top serve 100 people?Thank you. This is a groom's cake I am baking.

Great topic--I love cake and I love to bake!!

I am assuming that your 12x18x2 implies 12 inches wide by 18 inches long by 2 inches deep. I will also assume that the 10 inch by 10 inch cake is 2 inches deep which would be standard when baking a cake.

For the larger cake if you multiplied 12 x 18 you would get an area of 216 square inches. For the smaller cake on top if you multiplied 10 x 10 you would have an area of 100 square inches.

If you cut each piece of cake into a 2 inch by 2 inch square piece, each piece would have an area of 4 square inches. So divide 216 by 4 and you get 54 pieces. Then if you divide 100 by 4 you get 25 pieces. 54 pieces + 25 pieces equals only 79 pieces.

Personally, I like cake and if you measure out anything smaller that 2 inches by 2 inches for a piece of cake it really gives you such small pieces that is not more than a bite or two of cake.

It is my opinion that you would not be able to get 100 pieces of cake worthy of serving at a wedding.

What does it mean in Chapter 8 when the pig's head talks to Simon? What is the Beast?

The Beast, is, as Golding's final page has it, "the darkness of man's heart". It's the evil, the fundamental badness, inside all human beings - which has to be fought to prevent human civilisation descending into savagery. And what you're seeing when the "beast" talks here, is Simon hallucinating - remember that Simon suffers from epilepsy (and possibly other things as well) and has some sort of gift of prophecy.

"Maybe... it's only us", Simon says right at the start of the novel. And the Beast gives the same verdict on the situation: "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?". It's Simon's mind in dialogue with itself.

It's also a clever pun. The flies swarming around the pig's head give the illusion of movement, making the head seem alive. The head, then, becomes the "Lord" of the flies - which is a translation of "Beelzebub" or the Devil. So what symbolically speaks as "the darkness of man's heart" is also, literally, the lord of the flies - the devil.

Hope it helps!

In "By the Waters of Babylon", what was the Place of the Gods?

In "By the Waters of Babylon", the Place of the Gods is a destroyed New York City many, many years in the future.  John has a deep longing to go to the Place of the Gods, even though it is forbidden by the priests of his society.  By the end of the story, it is apparent that the priests know the truth of this place and do not wish to share that knowledge with the Hill People.  That is because the Hill People believe that those who dwell in the city beyond the Ou-Dis-On river are gods.  John learns, after he travels there and has a vision regarding the "fire that falls from the sky", that the "gods" are really men who ended up destroying themselves with their greed and technology.  That is one reason why the priests do not want the people to know the truth.  If they knew the gods were really men, then their entire society (which is based on their belief in the gods) would collapse.  In order to avoid anarchy and chaos, John also agrees not to tell the truth right away.  He hopes to feed it to the people a little bit at a time in the hope that they will not repeat the patterns of the past.

In The Odyssey, how is Odysseus destined to die?

The audience of the Odyssey, which was originally an oral epic poem, would have known how the mythical Odysseus really did die. In the poem, which the blind prophet Tiresias tells him that he will die a death from the sea, no other information is immediately given. 


The audience would have known that this was a reference to his death from his son. During his travels, he was captured by the sea-witch Circe. When he left, Circe was pregnant, but he had no knowledge of it. She gave birth to their son, named Telegonus, who grows to manhood without him. 


Many years later, after his safe return to Ithaca and Penelope and Telemachus, he is living in happiness. However, his son Telegonus has decided that he really wants to meet his long-lost father. Telegonus sets out to sea in search of him, and actually ends up on Ithaca. When he arrives, he is desperately hungry, so he kills some of the Ithacan sheep to feed himself. From the palace above the beach, Odysseus sees this happening. He thinks that Telegonus is a pirate and thief, and goes down to confront him and drive him away. Odysseus and Telegonus start fighting. Neither of them know who the other is. Finally, Odysseus is killed by Telegonus's spear, which is tipped with poison from a sting ray. 


Tiresias's prophecy really does come true--his death comes from the sea. 

In "By the Waters of Babylon", what are three examples of wonderful things he discovers?

1.  "There were pictures upon the walls, very strange, very wonderful".  He describes the pictures being just specks of color up close, but forming flowers from far away, and they made his heart feel "strange".

2.  Books.  He was awed by all of the books, written "in tongues that I could not read", and he concludes that their owner must have sought wisdom, just as he is.

3.  The dead man.  This might not seem wonderful, but it led to his great realization that these were not gods, "They were men -- they went a dark road, but they were men".  This revelation was life-changing, not only for him, but for everyone, because he concludes that they can now "make a beginning."  It will reshape their lifestyle, beliefs, customs, and traditions.

In Maus II, what qualities does Vladek have that allowed him to "cope" at Auschwitz?How did these qualities work against him in his later life?

In Maus II, Vladek exhibits his extreme sense of resourcefulness, and this trait allows him to cope at Auschwitz.  Vladek tells Art that the prisoners were given limited portions of food, so Vladek routinely ate half his portion of bread during regular meal times and saved the other half for later.  Also, Vladek is able to get his hands on items such as cheese that he is able to trade for favors from others in the camp. 


Later in life, Vladek's resourcefulness works against him because he does not fully realize that he is no longer in a position that warrants such resourcefulness.  For example, after Mala leaves, Vladek has extra food that he tries to get Art and Francoise to take with them.  After they refuse the food, Vladek decides that it cannot go to waste, so he tapes up an almost-empty box of cereal and returns it to the grocery store.  Art and Francoise are completely embarrassed by Vladek's behavior, but they can do nothing to convince him otherwise.

Sunday, April 20, 2014

What "single effect" do you think Poe intends to create in "The Masque of the Red Death"?

The intended effect of the story is a feeling of horror. The first paragraph introduces this tone with Poe's detailed description death from the "pestilence" known as the "Red Death." It is "hideous" with "the horror of blood," including "profuse bleeding at the pores" and "scarlet stains . . . especially upon the face of the victim." Blood (and the color of blood) function as a major motif in the story; Poe establishes it immediately and returns to it again and again. For instance, the windows in the final chamber are "a deep blood color."


The appearance of the mysterious masked figure intensifies the sense of growing horror in the story. He is tall and emaciated and "shrouded from head to foot in the habiliments of the grave." His face is that of a "stiffened corpse" and is so real in appearance it is difficult to distinguish it from that of a real corpse. His clothing and face are "dabbled" and "besprinkled" with blood, "the scarlet horror." When they attack the repulsive figure, Prospero's guests find "in unutterable horror" there is no physical body beneath the robe or the mask. The story ends in the final horror: "And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all."

How are the characters in Lord of the Flies presented as both "heroic and sick"? As both sane and insane? As both good and evil?

Simon is the best example of a character who is both "heroic and sick". He suffers from epilepsy, & when in throes of a seizure, he hallucinates the Lord of the Flies speaking to him. Other characters continually refer to him as "strange", & he seems to know when he needs to be alone. Often, after a seizure has passed, he finds himself with a bloody nose. all of this would be a reflection of his sickness. Yet he is heroic as well, in that his sickness allows him to discover the true nature of the beast. He realizes it lives within each person, & that in order to defeat the evil, one must face it head-on. He dies while trying to share this with the other boys, showing his courage in attempting to bring knowledge to the rest.


Ralph has moments of both sanity and insanity. Throughout most of the story, he thinks rationally, although not always successfully. He tries to plan carefully, focusing on rescue and shelter. However, he eventually submits to the bloodlust and savagery of the other boys. When Simon rushes to tell them the truth of the beast, Ralph falls on him in a frenzy with the rest. He will recognize his responsibility later, but the fact remains that he willing participated in the murder of another human being. Returning to sanity afterward does nnot exonerate him from his actions.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

What is the summary for Part 1, Chapter 14 of The Underdogs?

Demetrio and his men are impressed with Luis and his ideas with reclaiming what is rightfully theirs.  A couple men decide to take their women with them when they leave, and Demetrio plans on leaving in the next twenty-four hours.  Demetrio checks with Luis to see if he is courting Camilla.  Luis informs him that he is not interested in her at all and that she like Demetrio but is afraid of him.

Near the end of the day, Camilla went to fetch water as she normally does.  Luis went at the same time to talk to her.  He wanted to thank her for all of her help and kindness and to say goodbye.  She expresses her frustration in him ignoring her.  He pushes her to take interest in Demetrio.  After all, he will become a general and will be able to provide her with wealth and a great life.  She tells him that she only cares for him.  In her shame she has him leave.  When she turns around, he is gone.  She walks along the river and catches her reflection in the water.  She had dressed in her best to please Luis, yet it did no good.  He rejected her all the same.  As she wept, nature seemed to follow her lead as the frogs chanted a sad song and a dove cried as well.

Friday, April 18, 2014

In Chapter 8 of "Lord of the Flies", as Ralph considers the need to reassign firekeepers, what does he realize?

Here's the bit from the novel you're referring to:



“Can’t they see? Can’t they understand? Without the smoke signal we’ll die here? Look at that!”


A wave of heated air trembled above the ashes but without a trace of smoke.


“We can’t keep one fire going. And they don’t care. And what’s more—”



Ralph has realised that the other boys have failed to realise the importance of the fire, and that, no matter how well he puts his case across, the glamour and excitement of Jack's hunting raids seem more attractive than keeping the fire.


In short, what Ralph has realised is that he's losing his grip over the island - and that their chances of rescue are diminishing.

Define irony in the passage were Philip changes schools and doesnt know that words to the "Star Spangled Banner"?

The irony is dramatic irony.  In "Nothing But The Truth" Phillip had to leave his other school because he brought a complaint against the teacher for not letting him hum the "Star Spangled Banner" during the opening of each day.  Phillip did it just to make the teacher mad, but when he got into trouble his family, the community, and the press all got involved.  He was labeled a patriot.  When he got to the new school, he had to admit that he didn't even know the words to the song that he fought so hard to sing.  Phillip wasn't really a patriot, he didn't even know the words to the National Anthem. "By the end of Nothing but the Truth, the idealistic teacher is able to see through the district superintendent's lies. Philip, on the other hand, seems not to have grown at all. His crying and saying that "I don't know the words" are indicative of self-pity, not personal understanding. "

Why can't we exceed the speed of light?

hmmm....  Admitedly, I am much more a metaphysician and philosopher, but, I am an avid lover of science.  Physics, quantum physics, and time in particular.  So...  If I may, knowing I risk being totally destroyed by others with more informed minds and opinions/facts on the matter, I'd like to throw in my two cents.


I would posit a few "devil's advocate" ideas in terms of playing the part of the uninformed.  After all, it is only the posits of the uninfomred mind that lead us to become informed.  (Had Einstein never suggested that time may not be the most constant entity in the universe, we would have had a much more laborious and drawn-out discovery of relativity, if ever.  Or more simply, had Columbus never mistakenly thought himself to discover India when in reality he stumbled upon North America, we would be uninformed of the proper nomenclature of native American's and native Indians.)


I recently checked out a book called "Faster Than The Speed of Light" by Joao Magueijo.  He is, frankly, quite brilliant in my opinion.  He suggests the possiblity that light (the constant, or "c" in E=MC squared) may have traveled faster than 186,000 miles per second at some point in the past.  The implications are incredible.  It has a profound influence on the development of the universe and other cosmological considerations.  I have not finished the book yet, so I'll stop short of speculating on theories I have not studied fully as of yet.  However, I think he has quite a lot of merit to some of his theories.  It is called, VSL. (Varrying Speed of Light theory)  It does not neccasarily stop with the notion of "c" being greater in the past.  It is possible that "c" can be manipulated even now in the scientific world, and the possibility of such happening in it's own "natural" way is not so far-fetched in my way of thinking.  If light itself is capable, albeit by the possible virtue of actually having uniquely different properties than light as we are able to observe it today, of exceeding the constant we all know and love, then via relativity, some manner of warping time, or, more accurately, dilating time to the extent of moving backwards through it, or stopping it all together, would certainly be a reality in the universe. 


This could suggest the possibility of interdimensional activty with possible different universes, (if you beleive in that) that we are incapable of witnessing, at least at present, but see the effects of on a daily basis in that it serves the universe a purpose in keeping the fabric of our "taken for granted" reality sewn together by whatever higher function the mechanics therein may serve.   OR, it could suggest the possiblity of tachyon influence, or presence in the universe as being something real and somehow avoiding the crime of violating the theory of relativty and other conventions of physics that all entities in the universe are supposed to adhere to. 


I, for one, have always been a bit on the absurd side when it comes to considering some of these things.  I obey the rules, for the most part, because they are what they are, and more often than not, they are true and real.  I subscribe to the laws and theories and formulae of modern physics, but I like to play with them on a philosophical level because it entertains my mind and makes for most excellent science fiction.  ( I write science fiction.) 

In "The Scarlet Letter," what crime has Hester committed? What punishment has she been given?

Hester is guilty of the "sin" of adultery.  As punishment, is forced to stand on a platform in the town square, an example and a spectacle, for all to see.  Thereafter, she is forced to affix a bright, red letter "A" which identifies her at all times to the community, to strangers, and to herself.  The "A" brands her and never lets anyone forget her sin against both man and God.

The sentence, and the reaction by the majority of the community, is expressed Chapter Two, "The Recognition."  A townsman delivers the news.  Though some argue Hester should have been executed, the elders,

"...in their great mercy and tenderness of heart, they have doomed Mistress Prynne to stand only a space of three hours on the platform of the pillory, and then and thereafter, for the remainder of her natural life, to wear a mask of shame on her bosom."

"A wise sentence!" remarked a stranger, gravely bowing his head.  "Thus she will be a living sermon against sin, until the ignominious letter be engraved on her tombstone."

Although Hester certainly did not commit her "crime" alone, her partner has escaped similar humiliation and punishment, a fact not lost on the stranger.  He says,

"It irks me, nevertheless, that the partner of her iniquity should not, at least, stand on the scaffold by her side.  But he will be known! -- he will be known!  -- he will be known!"

Thursday, April 17, 2014

What blunders does Brutus commit in "Julius Caesar"?How would you show that it is an idealist who commits these blunders?

Brutus is a tactical disaster. Crucially, he keeps getting major tactical decisions in the play wrong: and whether because of his idealism (that is, the belief that he is doing the right thing for Rome) or his self-regard (that is, the belief that he is doing the right thing for Rome) he doesn't seem to question himself at all.

The way to show that he commits these blunders for one reason or another is simply to justify in the text why you think he does it. I'd say he makes three major blunders in the play:

1) Over-ruling Cassius about killing Antony at the same time as Caesar.

2) Telling Portia about the conspiracy, leading to her suicide.

3) Over-ruling Cassius (again) in the tent-scene about the battle plan, which goes disastrously wrong and leads to both men's deaths.

I'll analyse the first-one to show you what I mean. Cassius makes a perfectly reasonable argument about murdering Antony:

We shall find of him
A shrewd contriver; and you knkow his means,
If he improve them, may well stretch so far
As to annoy us all...

No argument - Brutus just tells Cassius "no", because Antony is only a "limb of Caesar":

Let us be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius.
We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar
And in the spirit of men there is no blood

Pure idealism. Brutus is proved wrong when the murder creates so much blood that he cannot ignore it, and so tries to make it an idealistic symbol - the hand-washing.

What are some quotes that reveal Hamlet's attitude of superiority?

In a recent television documentary, it was reported that psychologists concur that people who are realistic would be diagnosed as clinically depressed. Hamlet is such a person; he perceives the true nature of the characters in Shakespeare's play.  And, because he is so realistic, Hamlet descends into deep melancholia and feelings of isolation.  In his attempt to reclaim being--"to be, or not to be"--Hamlet lashes out cynically at the foibles of those who have contributed to the making of "something....rotten in Denmark." 

For one, Hamlet is repulsed by Polonius, calling him "a hypocrite" and a "wretched, rash, intruding fool" (iii,iv,33-32-33).

Dismissing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, former friends, as hypocrites, also, Hamlet calls Rosencrantz a "sponge" (IV.ii,12):

But such officers [as you] do the king best service in the end.  he keeps them like an apple in the corner of his jaw, first mouthed to be last swallowed.  When he needs what you have gleaned [by getting information from me], it is but squeezing you and, sponge, you shall be dry again(Iv,ii,15-18).

Also subject to Hamlet's superior accusations of hypocrisy, Gertrude asks her son, "What have I done that thou dar'st wag thy tongue/In noise so rude against me?" (III,iv,40-41)  And, Hamlet replies, showing her a picture of his father, reminding her of King Hamlet's majesty, comparing him to Claudius. 

Ha, have you eyes?You cannot call it love, for at your age/The heyday in the blood is tame...What devil was't/..Eyes without feeling, feeling without sight...(III,iv,68-79)

The queen tells Hamlet that his criticism of her, his words are "like daggers [that]enter in my ears...(III,iv,96).  And, certainly Hamlet is cruel to Ophelia, yet later he declares his love for her. (I'm out of room)

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

What is one of the main conflicts and solutions in the book Little Women?

This book has many conflicts. The first and most obvious conflict is the war. The war separates families, and causes death everywhere. A second conflict in the book is between Jo and Amy. The conflict centers around their mutual adoration of Ashley and the jealousy that creates. There are also gender conflicts in the novel. The girls dress up as men to perform their plays, and Jo cuts off her hair to sell. These activities are acts of rebellion against a pro ladylike society.

What is the summary for Chapter 16 of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone?

Chapter Sixteen:  Through the Trapdoor

The students take their exams.  Just as Harry thinks that Hagrid would never tell anyone how to get past Fluffy, he gets a panicked look on his face and goes down to see Hagrid.  It turns out that a cloaked figure was going to play cards with Hagrid for the dragon egg; however, the figure wanted to see if Hagrid could “handle it” first.  As a result, Hagrid revealed to the cloaked figure that the way to get past Fluffy was to put him to sleep with music. 

When Harry, Ron, and Hermione run to tell Dumbledore the news, they find that he had just left because he “received an urgent owl from the Ministry of Magic.”  They determine that tonight is the night that the Sorcerer’s Stone will be stolen while Dumbledore is away.  Harry realizes that his life depends on Voldemort not getting the Sorcerer’s Stone; therefore, the three friends (Harry, Hermione, and Ron) vow to go on a quest together to steal the stone first.  Before they leave, Neville stands up to his friends, hoping no more points will be taken from Griffindor. However, Hermione puts the “Full Body-Bind” on Neville to leave him there motionless. 

With the invisibility cloak covering them, the three discover the door to the third corridor already ajar.  When they enter the room where Fluffy resides, there is a silent harp under his feet.  The three decide that Snape has already been there.  Fluffy sniffs at them, but can’t see them because of the invisibility cloak.  Fluffy falls asleep as Harry plays Hagrid’s flute.  Therefore, the three make it though the trap door. 

The three fall on an unusual plant called Devil’s Snare that begins to bind them tightly with its tendrils.  Hermione escapes its grip right away and frees Harry and Ron though her knowledge of “Herbology” by using her wand to create a jet of blue flames to make the plant cringe.

Next comes a mysterious room with brooms and a flock of flying keys.  Obviously someone has already completed this task because the correct key has bright blue wings that are all crumpled on one side.  All three mount brooms and, with all the other keys chasing them, manage to work together to grab the key to enter the next room.

The next room holds a large, enchanted game of chess.  Ron takes the lead as the three friends play their way across the board to avoid being broken like the other chess pieces.  It isn’t long before they realize that Ron will have to sacrifice himself in order to win the game.  Ron remains there, hurt, while the other two progress forward.

Finally, Hermione and Harry enter the room of Snape’s enchantment.  Immediately, black flames block their path while purple flames block their retreat.  The two use logic to figure out a puzzle about which potion to drink.  There is only enough for one person, so Harry asks Hermione to drink the potion to go back to Ron in order to help him.  Harry drinks the potion to move onward.  As an icy sensation moves through Harry, he walks straight through the black flames.  Immediately he is surprised that the person in the next room isn’t Snape or Voldemort.

In Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," why does Montresor search with his trowel the inside of the cavity where he has imprisoned Fortunato?

Montresor does not use his trowel to search the recess where he has imprisoned Fortunato. Here is the passage in question:



A succession of loud and shrill screams, bursting suddenly from the throat of the chained form, seemed to thrust me violently back. For a brief moment I hesitated -- I trembled. Unsheathing my rapier, I began to grope with it about the recess; but the thought of an instant reassured me. I placed my hand upon the solid fabric of the catacombs , and felt satisfied. I reapproached the wall. I replied to the yells of him who clamoured. I reechoed -- I aided -- I surpassed them in volume and in strength. I did this, and the clamourer grew still.



Poe specifies that Fortunato is wearing a tight-fitting jester's costume. He would be unarmed. Montresor is wearing a short black cloak and has a rapier concealed under it. He has Fortunato at his mercy from the time they enter the underground vaults. He could kill him with his rapier any time he wants, but he prefers to kill him in the manner he finally does, which may explain why he acts in such a zany fashion. He is momentarily alarmed when Fortunato begins screaming, and he thinks of stabbing him to death. But then he realizes that no one could hear his victim no matter how loud he screamed. Poe wants to show the reader that the plot is foolproof. Montresor can carry out his revenge with the "impunity" which is so essential. He can leave Fortunato there behind the wall and his victim can scream his head off without being heard. In fact, Montresor would probably like to think of Fortunato screaming and screaming in the dark until he finally gave up hope.

22 1/2 + 15 2/3 + 18 3/5 equals?

Note:


Many math textbooks will show answers as follows: your answer should always be in the form with which you started.


Example 1: if your problem begins with a mixed number, then your answer should be in a mixed number instead of a fraction.


Example 2: if your problem begins with a fractional exponent, then your answer should be with exponents instead of in radical form.


Example 3: if your problem begins with an radical, then your answer should be with a radical instead of in exponent form.


The exception to these three examples are when the problem reduces to a whole number.

Why does Rainsford agree to become "the hunted" in "The Most Dangerous Game"?

Rainsford has no choice but to become the "hunted" in this story.  General Zaroff tells him he must play or he will turn Rainsford over to Ivan to be tortured and killed.  By playing the game he at least has a fighting chance to get away.  By refusing he would die a most painful and ugly death.

In "One Of These Days" by Gabriel Garcia Marquez ,what do the mayor's words mean in the last sentence when he says "It's the same damn thing."?I...

Why are the mayor's last words to Aurelio Escovar important? It's important because he is openly admitting his corruption to the dentist. As my colleague above states, the mayor equates his own power to that of the town's. The mayor represents the corrupt politicians who wield the power of the state as their own.


There may also have been a note of warning in the mayor's words. When Escovar's son tells him that the mayor will shoot him if the dentist does not pull his abscessed tooth out, Escovar is unperturbed. He has his own gun. However, when the mayor comes in and Escovar realizes that the mayor has been suffering for five days, he puts the gun away. The mayor is in no condition to shoot anyone, least of all the dentist who can take away his pain.


It is evident that Escovar knows all about the corrupt ways of the mayor; before he yanks out the infected tooth, he tells the mayor



"Now you’ll pay for our twenty dead men.”



Escovar tells the mayor that he will have to pull his tooth without anesthetic because it is abscessed. Anesthetic is extremely sensitive to pH balances; the pH surrounding the inflamed area may have been too acidic to render any anesthetic effective. Although well-trained dentists can use a number of other methods to numb the area surrounding the infection, we are told in the beginning of the story that our dentist does not have a degree in dentistry. So, why does the mayor go to this dentist? It is tempting to speculate that the mayor's power allows him to tolerate Escovar's illegal dental practice in exchange for Escovar's silence on the mayor's corrupt rule.


In his last words, the mayor may have wanted to remind Escovar that he is still very much the top dog in town. Avenging the death of twenty dead men through an anesthetic-free extraction may very well have been the only satisfaction Escovar will ever get as far as the mayor is concerned. The mayor knows he will never be held responsible for the deaths as long as he is in charge. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Do you think Macbeth would have killed Duncan if his wife had not urged him to do so?Cite evidence from the first two acts to support your opinion.

I think it just depends on how you read the text. I could make an argument to you either way. And I will.


Firstly, I think Macbeth shows real wavering doubts about doing the murder. He says, just after he receives the news that he's just going to leave it up to the fates, and let what happens happen:



If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me
Without my stir. Come what come may,
Time and the hour runs through the roughest day.



So that's evidence that he's not going to do it. And then later in Act 1, Scene 7, he talks himself right out of it, even telling Lady M



We will proceed no further in this business:
He hath honor'd me of late, and I have bought
Golden opinions from all sorts of people,
Which would be worn now in their newest gloss,
Not cast aside so soon.



She persuades him around. But before that, it looks very much like he isn't going to do it. And why would he? If the prophecies are true, they'd happen no matter what he did.


On the other hand, Macbeth admits very quickly after the prophecies that he has "black and deep desires" for the throne, for power, and to become king. It's clearly been going on long before the prophecies were made by the witches:



Stars, hide your fires;
Let not light see my black and deep desires:
The eye wink at the hand; yet let that be
Which the eye fears, when it is done, to see.



Macbeth is undoubtedly ambitious. And, in the end, he does the deed and murders Duncan. Surely he wouldn't murder someone simply because his wife said so? Or would he?


It's one of those questions. You can't imagine him without his wife, really - you can't imagine what he'd be like. So you can argue it both ways.


Hope it helps!

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

In what way does Blanche symbolize the Old South and Stanley the North in A Streetcar Named Desire?

Blanche definitely represents the Old South. She even grew up in a stereotypical Southern mansion and was encouraged to behave like a stereotypical Southern belle. She is not emotionally equipped to cope with the modern world. She needs to be sheltered and protected, as women used to be in the Old South. Her mind is filled with romantic notions. She expects men to treat her with old Southern chivalry and gallantry.


Stanley, on the other hand, does not necessarily represent the North. More likely he is intended to represent the "New South" which is becoming more and more like the North because of the transition from agriculture to industrialization. We understand why Blanche is living in the South, but it is never quite clear why Stanley is living in New Orleans rather than in some city like Chicago or Pittsburgh. He doesn't have any roots in the South; he just happened to end up there. More than representing the North, Stanley represents the social evolution taking place in the South, which includes the decline of the old aristocracy and the ascension of the proletariat.


William Faulkner often wrote about the contrast between the Old South and the New South, notably in the so-called "Snopes Trilogy," consisting of The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion. The decline of the Old South and the rise of the drastically different New South is a favorite theme with Southern writers.

What are examples of foreshadowing in "The Interlopers" and what are the themes?

At the very beginning of the story the narrator is describing how the fighting began between the two families.  He writes, “as men each prayed that misfortune might fall on the other,” The roebuck, which usually kept in the sheltered hollows during a storm-wind, were running like driven things to-night, and there was movement and unrest among the creatures that were wont to sleep through the dark hours. Assuredly there was a disturbing element in the forest, “

The fact that the deer are running indicates the presence of predators.  Not all predators in woods that night are men.  This is an example of foreshadowing of something bad happening before the story ends.

The themes of this story are: "Enmity, the hatred each feels toward the other. Community The uneasy relationship between Ulrich and Georg has repercussions within the community. Man and Nature The very title of the story alludes to the fact that the men are trespassing on the forest in their attempts to assert ownership of it. Social Class The Gradwitz family occupies a higher social class than the Znaeym family, and this is one of the reasons that the feud has lasted throughout the generations."

Analyze the childhood world of Jem, Scout, and Dill and their relationship with Boo Radley in Part One.How to write it as an essay?

The children's relationship with Boo in Part One is important in that this subplot sets the stage for the greater trial coming up in the adult world around them. Jem, Scout and Dill first have their own notions about Boo and none of them are very complimentary. They are drawn to him by a sort of morbid fascination which has been encouraged by all the hearsay going on about Boo's domestic violence and night rambling. They are prejudiced against Boo in the same way that the white community is prejudiced against Tom Robinson.

Their attitude changes, however, when Boo patches up Jem's pants, then leaves little presents in the hole in the tree. Boo takes the first step to be the children's friend, even if it is only a "virtual" kind of way. 

The children's attitude towards Boo Radley begins to change even if they still have a gut fear of him actually coming around. When he puts a blanket around Scout as she watches Miss Maudie's house burn down, Jem and Scout are later in awe that they actually got that close. They harbour some fear of him even if they are aware that he means them no harm.

At the end of Part One, the reader can't help but wonder if the children aren't doing a better job at overcoming their unjustified fears and prejudice than the grownups in Maycomb. Also, a correlation arises between Boo and Tom, two innocent people ostracised and "found guilty" in the Deep South mind frame of the 1930s.

With evidence from the text, explain why the text is entitled "The Outsiders."I need an answer in paragraphs. At least 1 paragraph thank you.

The Outsiders is called what it is for a few reasons. The gang: Darry, Sodapop, and Ponyboy Curtis, Steve Randell, Two-Bit Matthews, Dallas Winston, and Johnny Cade are considered 'outsiders' because they are greasers, the poor boys of Tulsa. When you read the title, you think that they are the stereotype outsiders: tough, rough, mean, fighting boys who can't relate to or get along with anyone but themselves. The title can throw you off. As you read the novel, you realize that they are and aren't outsiders. They are not violent. They don't go looking for fights the way people expect them to. They are caring people, a big family, who never could, but wanted to, belong. In another way, they are outsiders: They hug each other. They read novels like 'Gone With the Wind'. They show affection and love for each other like no other gangs do. In that way, they are outsiders. Either way, S.E. Hinton created seven unforgettable characters that the nation fell in love with. The Outsiders truly is a story of growing up on the outside, looking in.

In Chapter 18 of To Kill a Mockingbird, how can Jem tell which characters do not wash regularly?

The word "lavations" is just another word for repeated washing ('laver' meaning 'wash' in French).


Mayella's skin looked basically healthy and taken care of whereas her father's looked rather scalded, as if a fierce scrubbing to get him presentable for court ( and which he wasn't used to) had taken off the first layer of his skin.

Monday, April 14, 2014

Describe the relationship between Macbeth and Banquo in Macbeth. Does the relationship change during act 1?

As the play begins, Macbeth and Banquo are friends and comrades in arms, both Scottish noblemen and valiant defenders of King Duncan. The first description of them concerns how fiercely they had recently fought together to defeat the forces of the King of Norway and Macdonwald, a traitor to the King.


Macbeth and Banquo together encounter the witches on the heath where Macbeth hears their prophecy for the first time. Banquo reacts as a friend would at the sound of Macbeth's good fortune, then seeks to know his own future. Shortly after, Banquo warns Macbeth of danger, explaining that the witches may not be trustworthy:



And oftentimes, to win us to our harm,




The instruments of darkness tell us truths,




Win us with honest trifles, to betray's




In deepest consequence.



By the end of Act I, Banquo still relates to Macbeth as his friend. Banquo has noticed a strangeness in Macbeth's behavior, but assumes it is merely a reaction to the new honor (Thane of Cawdor) he has suddenly received.


Macbeth and Banquo maintain their friendship into Act II, when Banquo mentions the witches. Macbeth lies, saying he never thinks of them, but tells Banquo that he would like to discuss them further. Macbeth then seeks to draw Banquo closer to him, inviting him to join Macbeth's cause when the time comes for him to become king. Banquo makes his position clear:



So I lose none




In seeking to augment it, but still keep




My bosom franchised and allegiance clear,




I shall be counseled.



With these words, Banquo sets limits on his loyalty to Macbeth. He will support Macbeth so long as he can do so with a clear conscience and an unguilty heart. Thus, Banquo's allegiance has been made conditional, a fact not lost on Macbeth.


After Duncan's murder and Macbeth's taking the throne, Banquo's suspicions are fully raised:



Thou hast it now: King, Cawdor, Glamis, all,




As the weird women promised, and I fear




Thou play'dst most foully for 't.



Banquo trusts Macbeth no more and dies shortly thereafter at Macbeth's command.

Write a critical note on Edmund Spenser's sonnets of his Amoretti.

In his Amoretti Spenser develops a unique sonnet form. The sonnet came to England primarily through the sonnets of Italian poet, Petrarch, the premier sonnet writer of Italy. Petrarch's sonnets were structured in two parts, an opening octet and an ending sestet without ending couplet. The volta, or "turn" in the logic of the subject of the sonnet occurs at the 9th line, the first line of the sestet. At the volta, Petrarch introduced--in the sestet--the sonnet's second but closely related idea leading from the problem introduced in the opening octet. An octet, also called octave, has eight lines while a sestet has six lines. Petrarch's sonnets have a rhyme scheme of abbaabba cdccdc (with rgyme scheme variations possible for the sestet), with the middle couplets (aa and cc) forming a concatenated link between rhyme schemes.


Spenser varied this structure by adopting three quatrains and an end couplet, with rhyme scheme of linking concatenation at the 4th and 5th and 8th and 9th lines. This linking concatenation (repetition of a rhyme in a couplet) allows a link between rhyme schemes and, even more importantly, between the ideas in the sonnet. Petrarch presented two related ideas in sonnets, the first in the octet and the second in the sestet, whereas Spenser can present three related ideas, one in each quatrain, with the couplet posing the dramatic solution to the problem introduced in the first quatrain. Spenser's rhyme scheme is ababbcbccdcd ee, with an ending couplet.


The concatenated lines are the spots at which Spenser introduces the second and third closely related ideas. Spenser's structure allows for either an evolution of the logic introduced in the first quatrain or, dramatically, a reversal of the logic begun in the first quatrain. Sonnet 1 demonstrates a sonnet in which the logic follows in an evolution of an idea:



Sonnet 1
Happy ye leaves when as those lily hands,
Which hold my life in their dead-doing might,
Shall handle you and hold in love's soft bands,
Like captives trembling at the victor's sight.
And happy lines, on which with starry light,
Those lamping eyes will deign sometimes to look
And read the sorrows of my dying sprite,
Written with tears in heart's close-bleeding book.
And happy rhymes bath'd in the sacred brook,
Of Helicon whence she derived is,
When ye behold that Angel's blessed look,
My soul's long-lacked food, my heaven's bliss.
Leaves, lines, and rhymes, seek her to please alone,
Whom if ye please, I care for other none.



In contrast, Sonnet 54 shows a logical reversal that occurs at concatenated line 9:



Sonnet 54    
Of this World's theatre in which we stay,
My love like the Spectator idly sits,
Beholding me, that all the pageants play,
Disguising diversely my troubled wits.
Sometimes I joy when glad occasion fits,
And mask in mirth like to a Comedy;
Soon after when my joy to sorrow flits,
I wail and make my woes a Tragedy.
Yet she, beholding me with constant eye,
Delights not in my mirth nor rues my smart;
But when I laugh, she mocks: and when I cry
She laughs and hardens evermore her heart.
What then can move her? If nor mirth nor moan,
She is no woman, but a senseless stone.



Sonnet 75 is another one that shows a reversal of logic, but at concatenated line 5.

What does Hippolyta think of the mechanicals' play in "A Midsummer Night's Dream"?

Hippolyta doesn't say a lot in the play - but from what she says first, it seems she finds the play itself rather ridiculous:

HIPPOLYTA: This is the silliest stuff that ever I heard

Theseus' response asks her to use her imagination to imagine them simply "shadows" (an Elizabethan term for "actors" as well as meaning something insubstantial") - and so inoffensive: 

THESEUS: The best in this kind are but shadows; and the worst are no worse, if imagination amend them.

HIPPOLYTA: It must be your imagination then, and not theirs

Hippolyta's response is rather damning about the mechanicals' acting abilities - their imaginations are not working very well, she suggests.

Hippolyta also briefly comments on the moon - firstly that he is boring, and then that she thinks he shines with "a good grace". Yet it is Hippolyta who eventually feels sorry for Pyramus and buys into the "imagining" of the play itself:

HIPPOLYTA: Beshrew my heart, but I pity the man

So she starts off sceptical - but is eventually captivated.

In Chapter fourteen of Ender's Game, what happens to Petra?

In chaper 14 Ender is the leader of a group of fighters.  His team includes Petra.  She is smart, strong, and as Ender characterizes her "brilliant.  He had depended too much on Petra and pushed her harder than any of the others.  During one of the battles Petra takes her force out too far and looses sight of the others. She makes a mistake, looses most of her fighters and falls apart.  As they carry her out of the battle room Ender can hear Petra screaming,



"Tell him Im sorry, I was just so tired, I couldn't think, that was all, tell Ender I'm sorry." pg 199



We later learn, when Mazer speaks to Ender, that Petra will recover.

In Heart of Darkness, what does the helmsman symbolize and how is he significant?

In addition, the helmsman lacks restraint, a quality Marlow very much admires. The cannibals, oddly enough, do have restraint, for even when they exhaust their food supply of hippo meat and go hungry for some time, they manage to restrain themselves from eating the people on the boat. Earlier one of the cannibals had indicated they would eat any natives on the bank whom the boat had passed by had any of these people been killed. When they're actually hungry, however, this crew on the boat doesn't eat anybody. Marlow does, nevertheless, deposit the helmsman's body in the river so they won't be tempted to eat him.

Kurtz as well lacks restraint. He "had given in to his various lusts," according to Marlow, and sunk to utter depravity. Both he and the helmsman die, as ms-mcgregor has indicated, because of their actions.

Explain what Tiresias means by his first statement to Oedipus. "How terrible to know/ when it does not help the knower."

 "Alas, alas! How terrible to know/ when it does not help the knower;"  In some other translations the line reads "Oh Fate!  How terrible it is to know/ when nothing good can come of knowing." (Treasury 37)  This is an example of the Greek dramatist's complete willingness to "give away the ending" of a play to the audience, effectively killing any suspense.  Tiresias, the blind man who can see the future, is telling us what will happen by the end of the play.  Since the tragedy of this play is that Oedipus unknowingly killed his father and then married his own mother, Jocasta, knowing these facts would not help Oedipus in the least.  The knowledge, when it comes out, leads to disaster, with Jocasta killing herself, Oedipus blinding himself, and Oedipus leaving his motherless children behind. Tiresias' statement is not only a revelation of the plot, but is a interesting commentary on morality.  If a person does not know that he or she is committing a heinous crime (such as patricide or incest,) is that crime of the same magnitude as it would have been if undertaken with full knowledge?  Is the revelation of that knowledge necessarily a right action if it only compounds the evil, without expiating it?  The answer is not given in the play -- it is up to the reader to decide.

Source: Treasury of Theatre, University of California Press, 1951

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...