Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Based on Odysseus's criticism of the Cyclops, what kind of society do you think the Greeks valued?

The Greeks very much valued hospitality.  In fact, it was somewhat of a religious imperative because Zeus was the god of travelers, and they believed that he offered protection to those who were far from home.  Thus, if you were kind and hospitable to any strangers who came to your home looking for shelter, food, and the like, you were actually paying homage to the most powerful of the gods.  This religious imperative was called xenia, and it entailed a reciprocal relationship between guest and host.  The host should offer what he could to any guest, and the guest should never take advantage of the host's generosity and should try to offer something in return if he were able.


Because of this tradition, Odysseus and his men expect that whoever lives in the cave they find will automatically share his food and supplies.  Odysseus brings a skin of wine as a gift for whoever this person is as well.  When the cyclops, Polyphemus, returns to his home and finds the men eating and drinking, he says that he doesn't fear Zeus at all nor have any reverence for Zeus's traditions.  He then proceeds to eat two of Odysseus's men (and he eats a total of four more before the men eventually escape).


Odysseus's criticism of the cyclops for his violent response to what the Greeks' view as a reasonable expectation shows just how prevalent this concept of xenia was.  It shows us that the Greeks valued hospitality and reciprocity in a world that, if inhospitable to travelers, would very seriously limit all possibility of travel.  Those communities or characters in this poem who do not offer hospitality are all monstrous, and Polyphemus is no exception.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...