This is an important question in understanding the evolution of the relationship between John and Elizabeth. The three key players all know what's at stake (Danforth, John and Abigail), however, Elizabeth only knows that her moral ethic is torn. On the one hand, if she lies to save her husband's reputation, she may go to Hell, on the other, if she tells the truth, her family and her husband's good name is destroyed. It is not simply that she says, "(faintly) No, sir." to save John's reputation, but that she is willing to condemn herself with the lie. This moment is not only the pivotal point in the play that determines Abigail's innocence in Danforth's eyes, it is also the resurrection of the intimacy between John and Elizabeth. Both now know each other's love and willingness to sacrifice for their love.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?
The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...
-
"Anthem (1938) is a science fiction novelette of a future primitive society in which the word "I" is forbidden. Rand's po...
-
It is significant that Ray Bradbury's exposition juxtaposes the character of Montag with Clarisse because the marked contrast alerts the...
-
He is in the middle of the marketplace where he and his aunt are walking "through the flaring streets, jostled by drunken men and barga...
No comments:
Post a Comment