This is an important question in understanding the evolution of the relationship between John and Elizabeth. The three key players all know what's at stake (Danforth, John and Abigail), however, Elizabeth only knows that her moral ethic is torn. On the one hand, if she lies to save her husband's reputation, she may go to Hell, on the other, if she tells the truth, her family and her husband's good name is destroyed. It is not simply that she says, "(faintly) No, sir." to save John's reputation, but that she is willing to condemn herself with the lie. This moment is not only the pivotal point in the play that determines Abigail's innocence in Danforth's eyes, it is also the resurrection of the intimacy between John and Elizabeth. Both now know each other's love and willingness to sacrifice for their love.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?
The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...
-
When the band had almost reached Cuquio, Anastasio Montanez rides up to Demetrio and jokingly tells him about what had happened to a poor ol...
-
The Magi, or the three wise men who come and kneel before the infant Jesus are a symbol of humility. These three kings come from afar to pa...
-
All three revolutions attempted to change government relatively quickly. Their results led primarily to the triumph of the Rule of Law, whic...
No comments:
Post a Comment