Thursday, August 15, 2013

What are the significant diferences between the techniques of Meisner, Strasberg and Adler, since they all stem from Group Theatre?Stanislavskian...

Thanks for asking this great question!  I wrote my thesis on this and it's great to think about it again!

 It's easiest to see the the distinction between Strasberg and Adler.  Their disagreement over the interpretation of Stanislavki's system was one of the main causes of the Group's closing.  Strasberg focused more on the first theory of Stanislavski -- dealing with the recreation of believable emotion through the use of emotional recall.  Actors use personal memories to dredge up emotions that their character needs to feel.

Adler was unhappy with this technique, feeling it was personally invasive, so she went to see Stanislavski, who told her he had changed his mind about the use of emotional recall and had switched to the Method of Physical Actions.  The U.S. was slow to receive the new information because of the lag of news out of Russia because of the two Russian Revolutions.  Adler's technique focused on what a person DOES when they feel an emotion; through the repeating of that action, believable emotion will be portrayed.  

Meisner focused more on the physical aspects of acting as well, dealing a great deal with the ideas of sense memory.  Through the use of sense memory, an actor may be able to find that most elusive concept of "being in the moment".  If you take a Meisner class, one of your first exercises will be the Cup of Coffee exercise, in which you endow a cup of water with the qualities of hot coffee.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...