To be precise, I'm not sure it is an oxymoron in context, because the entire phrase is "at once definitely unfamiliar and vaguely recognizable, as if I had only heard it described in words." In other words, Nick hasn't ever seen that expression before, but it seems familiar, like he's heard it described. It's important because it comes so soon after that wonderful line about Daisy's voice being full of money. That's an uncommon and impossible phrase, but Nick recognizes its rightness immediately. By contrast, Gatsby's expression isn't clear to Nick. This shows several things: Gatsby fools himself about himself, but not about Daisy, Nick can recognize insight, but his own is only limited, and so on. (It's also a sign in terms of plot that the source of Gatsby's fortune will be revealed soon.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?
The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...
-
"Anthem (1938) is a science fiction novelette of a future primitive society in which the word "I" is forbidden. Rand's po...
-
It is significant that Ray Bradbury's exposition juxtaposes the character of Montag with Clarisse because the marked contrast alerts the...
-
He is in the middle of the marketplace where he and his aunt are walking "through the flaring streets, jostled by drunken men and barga...
No comments:
Post a Comment