Sunday, March 16, 2014

In "To Kill a Mockingbird", why does Lee select a Cunningham to be a juror who cast the not-guilty vote?

Cunningham recognizes in Tom Robinson his own disenfranchised status in the town.  He can relate to the prejudice against Tom's race, having experienced the same prejudice against his own class.  Scout's recognition of Cunningham in the lynch mob would have reminded him of his connection to the Finches through the kindness to his son, and to himself, in former days.  The novel's shifting contrasts between characters, emphasizing on one hand their differences (as when Cunningham is part of the lynch mob) and their similarities (as when Cunningham is reminded of his lowly status) is a theme borne out by Lee's choice of Cunningham as the one holdout in favor of Tom Robinson's acquittal.  When Cunningham walks in Robinson's shoes, he can fairly judge him.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...