The alchemist probably chose to befriend Santiago because, like all "seers," he realized that it was Santiago who was "open" to finding him. The Englishman was looking for something other than what the alchemist could offer him. The Englishman was searching for something that the alchemist couldn't provide him, i.e., something tangible. What the Englshman was searching for was driven more by his own selfish needs rather than any intrinsic answers. In other words, the Englishman was searching for tangible riches. He was looking for a way to turn metal into gold in the strict sense. He didn't realize that the "riches" the alchemist could help him find were of the intangible sort. The alchemist knew this. He knew that, like so many others who came before the Englishman, what he sought were material riches. Those types of riches could not be provided by the alchemist. The riches that the alchemist could "provide," had more to do with uncovering "riches" already possessed by those who sought them for unselfish reasons. Realizing this in Santiago, the alchemist befriended Santiago; a "seeker" in the purest sense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?
The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...
-
"Anthem (1938) is a science fiction novelette of a future primitive society in which the word "I" is forbidden. Rand's po...
-
He is in the middle of the marketplace where he and his aunt are walking "through the flaring streets, jostled by drunken men and barga...
-
It is significant that Ray Bradbury's exposition juxtaposes the character of Montag with Clarisse because the marked contrast alerts the...
No comments:
Post a Comment