Wednesday, June 26, 2013

How does the mystery in The Name of the Rose differ from the mysteries of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes?

The Sherlock Holmes narrative is reflective of the classic detective story where the plot dominates.  There is an intellectual satisfaction in finding clues, putting the data together and coming up with a solution.  The reader is just as involved as the detective and there is always a closure to the mystery and the plot at the end; no loose ends.  The mystery is stereotypical, the characters are never elaborated and are usually one dimensional.


In the medieval mystery, the plot is important, however not paramount to the outcome.  The story is usually undercut by numerous sub-plots and sub-genres.   For example in the medieval murder mystery in  The Name of the Rose, the highlight is taken away from the murder by the sub-plot of the inquisition and the debate on heresy and the poverty of Christ.  There is also the sub-plot of the love interest,the debauched nature of monastic life, the interest in the language and the forbidden knowledge.


So in the medieval mystery, the characterisation is very important.  The solution is not what is driving the narrative.  The other aspects of the novel are explored and elaborated on around the mystery.  The mystery serves as a backdrop.  In The Name of the Rose, the most important element is the search for truth and interpretation of universal truths and the murder mystery is actually left up to the reader; it is not even solved!

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...