Thursday, August 30, 2012

How did the colonists' relationship with the Native Americans compare to their relationship with the African-Americans during the colonial period?

American colonists from European cultures viewed both Africans and Native Americans as substantially different in many ways.  Culturally, of course, both "Indians" and Africans were viewed as from totally different backgrounds and had totally different views of the world.  How the two non-Eurocentric groups were viewed was quite different, and varied by region.


Native Americans were viewed as human beings with a differing cultural perspective from the first in the Southern colonies.  Virginian William Byrd (1674-1744) wrote that "the best ambassador is a sprightly lover," as one of the justifications of intermarriage as a means of understanding and keeping the peace.  In New England, on the other hand, at first there was a debate as to whether or not the natives were human.  The Massachusetts colonials decided in the end that they were not, and had no souls.  Interesting, when one considers that neither colony would have survived without aid from the native peoples.


Africans were a different matter.  Europeans had had contact with Africans since Roman times, even black Africans from the interior.  Archaeology has discovered that there were great cities in the interior of Africa (not simply Carthage, Ethiopia or Egypt) long before Rome, but those cultures had disappeared long before contact of any sort with Europeans.  Black African cultures were mostly quite primitive outside of Ethiopia and Eritrea, and consequently were often viewed as inferior.  Blacks were first brought to the colonies by the Dutch to Virginia and traded to the colonists, but were treated as indentured servants and set free with pay and/or land after (usually) seven years.  The concept of slaves as chattel property in America, ie the equivalent of furniture or cattle, began in Massachusetts in 1644.  To justify this, a doctrine of black inferiority was developed, again in the Northern colonies rather than the South originally.  These concepts (chattel slavery and racial inferiority) spread throughout the colonies.


African-Americans played an important role during the Revolution, not only as soldiers but as spies.  Throughout the war George Washington personally ran one of the most successful spy rings in military history, largely consisting of blacks who worked as personal servants of British officers, including the generals commanding the British forces (Howe, etc.).


There were many free blacks in America during later colonial times (and in the South all the way to and through the Civil War).  Crispus Attucks, killed in the Boston Massacre, is perhaps the most famous.  There were also non-African slaves in the colonies, including Carribean "Indians" and some whites, largely from Scotland, kidnapped and sold in the aftermath of the Jacobite rebellions of 1715 and 1745.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...