Friday, May 31, 2013

Is there any conflict in the story "Gooseberries"?

Yes, there are definitely conflicts in "Gooseberries." Some of these conflicts revolve around Ivan and Nikolai's views of the world, and of their own actions. Where Nikoliai saw himself as pursuing his dream, Ivan saw  him as selfish. Where Nikolai found the taste of the gooseberries wonderful, Ivan found them bitter: they are not even living in the same world.



Others are conflicts in the larger framing story. Ivan has told this story about the past, but Aliokhin and Bourkin aren't satisfied with it. Here again Ivan's in conflict with the world view of others, and with what is found satisfying.

With what emotions does Elizabeth regard the veil at first and later on? What do her reactions suggest about the veil as a symbol?


But there was one person in the village, unappalled by the awe with which the black veil had impressed all beside herself....she, with the calm energy of her character, determined to chase away the strange cloud that appeared to be settling round Mr. Hooper, every moment more darkly than before.



Undisturbed by the mystery of the black veil, Elizabeth, Mr. Hooper's fiancee, feels that it should be "her privilege" to know what this veil conceals.  When she sits down with her fiance, she says, "There is nothing terrible in this piece of crape, except that it hides a face which I am always glad to look upon."  She asks him to put the veil aside and then tell her why he has put it on.  But, Mr. Hooper does not do so.  Instead, he replies that he will take it aside when "all of us shall cast aside our veils."


With his response Elizabeth becomes alarmed:  "What grievous affliction hath befallen you...that you should thus darken your eyes forever?"  She wonders what Mr. Hooper has done that he feels the need to cover his face.  Then, she worries that others may believe that he hides his face "under the consciousness of secret sin" and begs Mr. Hooper to remove the veil:  "For the sake of your holy office, do away this scandal!"


Mr. Hooper resists all her entreaties.  Elizabeth cries, and "a new feeling took the place of sorrow" as the "terrors fell around her."  Hooper asks her mournfully, "And do you feel it then at last?"  To this question she begs him to lift the veil one time and look her in the face.  He refuses; Elizabeth says, "Then, farewell!"  With one last "long, shuddering gaze" Elizabeth departs.


Nathaniel Hawthorne, the author of "The Minister's Black Veil" had a preoccupation with his family history and its Puritan heritage.  He was greatly disturbed by a theology that did not allow for any redemption from sin, feeling that this prohibition was the cause for much torment and guilt and hypocrisy.  In this narrative of Hawthorne's, the veil then becomes a symbol of the Puritan guilt for secret sin.  When Mr. Hooper first dons this veil, people wonder why he wears it, what he may have done.  Then, they begin to feel uncomfortable as they worry that he may know of their own secret sins.  Elizabeth, too, perceives the veil as mysterious after Mr. Hooper refuses to remove it.  She, too, wonders what he may have done; then, she, too, shudders as she "feels it at last"--her own guilt.  This guilt, this secret sin, isolates them forever. 

Thursday, May 30, 2013

How does Ibsen convey through his play the position of females at his time?

This is similar to a question that I have recently answered and picks up a key theme in this play. In A Doll's House, the position of females in Ibsen's time is examined and he presents his hope for feminism and equality through the character of Nora and her realisation of her situation and her choice to embark on a search for her own identity.


At the beginning of the play, the relationship of Nora and Torvald is examined. It is clear that their relationship has more in common with a father and daughter relationship than with a husband and wife, and we discover that Nora relates to her husband and is treated exactly the same way that she related and was treated by her father. In response to her husband's insulting comments and patronising remarks, Nora cajoles, begs and acts like a child (or even a "doll"). Torvald even says: "Has my little sweet tooth been indulging herself in town today by any chance?" Nora responds using childish phrases: "Oh. Pooh!" It is clear that Torvald possesses Nora and regards her as nothing more than a belonging to make him look good.


Nora, too, at the beginning of the play, is caught up in this "Doll's House", as we can see in her definition of freedom which she gives to Mrs. Linde: "Free. To free, absolutely free. To spend time playing with the children. To have a clean, beautiful house, the way Torvald likes it." She is unable to perceive her situation as being caged inside her "Doll's House" and plays a part of the perfect wife according to her husband's wishes.


Of course, the action of the play, and in particular the realisation of Torvald that Nora has deceived him and his response, triggers the epiphany that Nora needs to realise the truth of her situation and give her the desire to escape this "Doll's House". In his response to this realisation, Torvald shows himself to Nora for who he really is: a self-centred, petty man who is concerned only about keeping up the facade of marriage: "From now on, forget happiness. Now it is just about saving the remains, the wreckage, the appearance." It is this unmasking that gives Nora self-understanding of her situation. She says to Torvald, "I've been performing tricks for you Torvald. That's how I've survived. You wanted it like that. You and Papa have done me a great wrong. It's because of you I've made nothing of my life." By the end of the play then, she becomes a stronger, tougher more independent individual, determined to make her own life free from the constricting gender roles that have been imposed upon her.

In Macbeth, how does Lady Macbeth plan to kill King Duncan? She said that it looked like her father when he was asleep, is that why she didn't...

In Macbeth, from the moment that Lady Macbeth receives Macbeth's letter advising her of the witches' prophecies, Lady Macbeth begins scheming to make Macbeth king the "nearest" (Act I.scene v.line 15) (as in the quickest) way. She does not think that Macbeth will be able to fulfill the prophecies without her help because she says he is "too full of the milk of human kindness" (14). She intends, therefore, to "pour my spirits in thine ear" (23) and do all that she can to remove any obstacles that have the potential to stop what "fate" (26) has deemed should happen. To be certain that she can deliver, she even begs the spirits to "unsex me here" (38) so that she will not be tempted, in seeing "the wound it makes" (49), to stop. Lady Macbeth also tells Macbeth not to worry as she will make all the necessary arrangements. 


In convincing Macbeth that they will not fail in their quest to make him king, Lady Macbeth explains to Macbeth that, when Duncan is asleep, she will offer wine (which she will drug) to his "two chamberlains" (I.vii.63), his guards, and the men will get drunk; where-after, they will sleep deeply "as in a death" (68), which means that she and Macbeth will be able to do anything they want to the "unguarded Duncan" (70). She points out that they will place the blame squarely on the guards and will themselves, make such a commotion upon hearing of Duncan's murder that no one will suspect. This is sufficient to persuade Macbeth to go ahead with the plan. 


Lady Macbeth then leaves everything ready; the door open, the guards drugged and drunk and the daggers with which to kill Duncan in place. While she waits for Macbeth to actually kill Duncan, she feels sorry that she was unable to perform the deed herself, commenting to herself that Duncan resembles her own father "as he slept" (II.ii.13). This prevents her from killing him herself, which she would have preferred, in fact, because then she would not have to worry about Macbeth's ability. 

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

In "The Crucible", Hale ask John to recite the Ten Commandments and he can't recite all of them. Elizabeth must complete the list by citing the...

The purpose that Reverend Hale has in asking John Proctor to recite the Ten Commandments is to test him on his degree of faith.  He does not attend church regularly, is very outspoken about how he dislikes Reverend Parris, and because of this dislike, he has not had his last child baptized.

Reverend Hale is at the Proctor's home because he is investigating the members of the community to get a better understanding of the people to determine how bad the witchcraft scandal in the town really is.  And, because Elizabeth Proctor's name has been mentioned in court that day.  

When John Proctor is interviewed, or interrogated, he is asked to recite the Ten Commandments, and he can't remeber the commandment against committing adultery. 

Irony is when the outcome is different than what is expected. It is ironic, because he has committed adultery, with Abigail Williams.  He should know this commandment better than the other nine.  So it is ironic, since the reader would expect him to know it, and he can't remember it. 

Elizabeth knows that John committed adultery, so this moment in the play makes Proctor very self-conscious.  His lack of knowledge in the faith and his lack of church attendance and the fact that he has openly criticized the Pastor of the church put him in a suspicious light.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

In The Chrysalids, how does Uncle Axel go about building David's self-esteem?

In Chapter 8 of The Chrysalids, Uncle Axel seeks to build David's self-esteem after the fears he has had. His mother's sister, Aunt Harriet, took her life because she had given birth to another Deviation. David was present when both his mother and father chastised Harriet and reproached her for her sin and her horrible idea for saving her deviant baby. David is thrust up against the Definition of Man and the chant "Accursed is the Mutant!" right in his own home.


David becomes very fearful and earnestly prayers at all times to have his deviant ability removed. It is in this condition of near-terror that David goes to help Uncle Axel, who helps him to see that having a deviation doesn't make him accursed and that there may be a great use for his unorthodox ability. Uncle Axel tells him a story about a "rusted mirror" that cheers David up and helps him to calm down and focus on hiding his ability.


Uncle Axel is similar to Angus Morton in that neither one of them really believes the extreme ideas represented by the Definition of Man, but both, in their own ways, keep their opinions from interfering with their lives in Waknuk. Also Uncle Axel understands that at one time, having a Definition of Man helped preserve a recognizable humanity even though they were and are surrounded by indescribable mutations in the Badlands and Black Coast.

What are the main themes developed in "The Lion and the Jewel" by Wole Soyinka?

this is the smmary of the play. this play consists 3 section as morning . noon and night.


Morning


A schoolteacher is teaching a class the times table when Sidi walks past carrying a pail of water on her head. The teacher peers out of the window and disappears. Two 11-year-old schoolboys start ogling her, so he hits them on the head and leaves to confront her. At this point, we find out that the schoolteacher is Lakunle. He is described as wearing a threadbare and rumpled clean English suit that is a little too small for him. He wears a tie that disappears beneath his waistcoat. His trousers are ridiculously oversized, and his shoes are blanco-white. He comes out and insists on taking the pail from Sidi. She refuses, saying that she would look silly. Lakunle retorts, saying that he told her not to carry loads on her head or her neck may be shortened. He also tells her not to expose so much of her cleavage with the cloth she wears around her breasts. Sidi says that it is too inconvenient for her to do so. She scolds him, saying that the village thinks him stupid, but Lakunle says that he is not so easily cowed by taunts. Lakunle also insults her, saying that her brain is smaller than his. He claims that his books say so. Sidi is angry.



When they are done arguing, Sidi wants to leave, but Lakunle tells her of his love for her. Sidi says that she does not care for his love. Eventually, we find out that Sidi does not want to marry him because Lakunle refuses to pay her bride-price as he thinks it a uncivilised, outrageous custom. Sidi tells him that if she did so, people will jeer at her, saying that she is not a virgin. Lakunle further professes how he wants to marry her and treat her "just like theLagoscouples I have seen". Sidi does not care. She also says that she finds the Western custom of kissing repulsive. She tells him that not paying her bride price is mean and miserly.

Monday, May 27, 2013

How is Tybalt "more than Prince of Cats"? What is "Prince of Cats"?I want to know how Tybalt is more dangerous than the fictional character the...

The "Prince of Cats" isn't a character in a fairy story. It's a nickname that Mercutio and Benvolio - and some of the other Montague boys, I think - have for Tybalt. Tybalt is the "Prince of Cats", and Mercutio's line means, in fact



Don't think he's just the Prince of Cats! Oh no - he's way more than that...



Why does Tybalt have the name "Prince of Cats"? It seems to be because he is such a fast swordsman, because he keeps taking deadly risks, and because he has nine lives (as Mercutio says in his death scene). Tybalt, Mercutio says,



He fights as you sing pricksong, keeps time, distance, and proportion; rests me his minim rest, one, two, and the third in your bosom! the very butcher of a silk button, a duellist, a duellist!



And, when Mercutio has been hurt by Tybalt's sword, referring to his role as a Cat (Cat-u-let, maybe?) complains he has received " a scratch, a scratch."


In that death scene, moreover, Mercutio keeps teasing Tybalt using that nickname - a dangerous comedy which heightens the scene. So Tybalt is a "ratcatcher", and, when Tybalt asks what Mercutio wants, Mercutio replies



Good King of Cats, nothing but one of your nine lives.



Hope that helps!

Who are the three main characters in "The Cask of Amontillado"?

Poe's story features three characters who are named: Montresor, Fortunato, and Luchesi. Montresor is the narrator of the story, telling the tale from the first-person point of view. Fortunato is the victim of Montresor's diabolical revenge. Luchesi is mentioned in the story, but he never actually appears. Montresor uses his name as a threat to keep Fortunato moving toward his impending death. He tells Fortunato that he will let Luchesi taste the Amontillado if Fortunato is not interested in trying it himself.


There is another "character" in the story, but this one is not even named or identified. Who is the person to whom Montresor confesses? A friend? A priest? A physician? Nobody knows for sure, but many have tried to figure out this mystery.

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Explain the situation that brings Alfred's mother to the store in "All the Years of Her Life" by Morley Callaghan.

Alfred's mother was called to the store by the owner, Sam Carr.  Mr. Carr had caught Alfred stealing, and rather than "call a cop in point-blank", he called Alfred's mother first to let her know that he was going to have Alfred locked up.


As Alfred had been preparing to leave the drugstore where he worked that day, his boss Mr. Carr had stopped him and asked him to empty his pockets before he went.  He told Alfred, "you've got a compact and a lipstick and at least two tubes of toothpaste in your pockets".  Alfred at first blusteringly denied that he had those things, but eventually had to empty his pockets as asked, producing the very items Mr. Carr had mentioned.  He then lied to Mr. Carr, insisting that this was the first time he had done such a thing, but Mr. Carr knew that Alfred had "been doing this pretty steady", stealing from the store for quite awhile.


Mr. Carr then told Alfred that he had liked him and would have trusted him, but now would have to turn him in.  He hesitated, however, and suggested to Alfred that maybe he should call in his father instead.  When Alfred told Mr. Carr that his father would not be home, Mr. Carr decided to call his mother in his place, to "see what she says".  Acting like "a swaggering, big guy who could look after himself", Alfred told Mr. Carr that he did not need to bring his mother into this, but Mr. Carr had already dialed and was speaking to her on the phone.

How does Bob Cratchit's attitude toward Scrooge differ from his wife's in A Christmas Carol?

In Stave 3, the Ghost of Christmas Present takes Scrooge to observe Christmas in the Cratchit house. Scrooge sees that they do not have much. The clothes of the women are old and worn, decorated with ribbons to make them beautiful. The best shirt of one of the sons is one that was handed down from his father and Tiny Tim is quite sick. He also sees that they are a happy family and full of love for one another and the spirit of the season in spite of the things that they lack.


As they sit around the fire after their meal, Bob proposes a toast to Scrooge, referring to Scrooge as "the founder of the feast." His wife gets upset and says that she wishes that Scrooge were there so that she could give him a piece of her mind. Bob reminds her that it is Christmas. She agrees then to toast Scrooge for the sake of her husband and because it is Christmas, but not out of any affection for Scrooge. Bob's wife seems to see their situation as the fault of Scrooge, while Bob seems to have no resentment toward Scrooge.

Why do Giles and Francis interrupt the court in "The Crucible"?

Giles Corey, Francis Nurse try to present a petition to the judge testifying to the innocence and pious character of Martha Corey (wife of Giles), and Rebecca Nurse (wife of Francis).  John Proctor also, in Act 3. sc. 1, is trying to get his wife, Elizabeth, acquitted of all charges.  They are not successful because their action is seen as an attempt to overthrow the court.  After the rebellion in Andover, Judge Hawthorne and Danforth are wary and tell them that they need to produce the signers of the petition.  Ultimately, they are unsuccessful in their attempt to save Martha Corey and Rebecca Nurse.

What does Hawthorne say about the evils of isolation in "The Scarlet Letter"?

In his own guilt over his relationship to an uncle who was a judge in the Salem Witch Trials, Hawthorne realized the destruction to the human heart that Puritanism has caused.  For, in denying the human weakness of sin, Puritanism created a prison within which the spirit and heart of people must live.  In "The Scarlet Letter," the first chapter opens with the Puritans, in their grey hats and garb standing outside the incongruous prison door.  (If the Puritans came to America for religious freedom, why do they need a prison?)  Is this prison meant to lock in/isolate sin and deny the fallible humanity of men and women that cannot truly be denied? 


It is because of this Puritan society that Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale suffer.  By her admission and obvious condition of sin, Hester is isolated from the townspeople.  However, she is liberated later through her charitable works which atone for her sin. 


This redemption underscores the point that Hawthorne has made about the evil restrictiveness of the Puritan code.  For, Dimmesdale is much more isolated than Hester in his secret sin, imprisoned as a Puritan minister who cannot confess without ruining his life.  Isolated from all, Dimmesdale's very spirit dies from this deprivation.  Isolation is death--death to the human heart and spirit; thus, it is the greatest of evils.

Saturday, May 25, 2013

In the short story "Two Kinds" by Amy Tan, how does the point of view affect the reader's perception of the story?

Since the story is told in first-person point of view by Jing-mei, we seem to understand and sympathize with her frustration and anger more than we do the mother's expectations and hope for her daughter and family. It is easy for us to understand the Americanized Jing-mei wanting to be able to choose her own future. However, because we are learning all of the information from her, we never truly understand why the mother is pushing her daughter so hard to be something she clearly does not want to be. We are given very little information about her life or culture in China before she came to the United States. Therefore, the mother comes across as harsh and cruel. When the mother says, "Only one kind of daughter can live in this house. Obedient daughter," the mother seems inflexible, stubborn and even a bit abusive. However, we do not know what circumstances she was brought up under or any of the problems she has had to endure in order to even have made it to the United States.

Friday, May 24, 2013

What is the theme of the poem "A Psalm of Life" by H. W. Longfellow?

In his poem, “A Psalm of Life,” Henry Wadsworth Longfellow argues that individuals should live active, full lives rather than passively allowing life to slip away. In the first two lines of the poem, the speaker asserts: “Tell me not, in mournful numbers, / Life is but an empty dream!” Here, the speaker counters religious theology that denigrates the value of life in anticipation of the afterlife. In contrast, Longfellow’s speaker suggests that “Life is real! Life is earnest! / And the grave is not its goal.” Thus, instead of passively waiting for the afterlife, the speaker urges individuals to act and to progress.


The speaker also differentiates between body and soul. In the second stanza, the speaker states, “Dust thou art, to dust returnest, / Was not spoken of the soul.” Here, the speaker posits the composition and decomposition of the body as it turns back into dust upon death. The soul, however, lives on and will not return to dust. Rather, the soul has the ability to progress, to move forward, and to seek activity.


In the final stanza, the speaker states:


Let us, then, be up and doing,


With a heart for any fate;


Still achieving, still pursuing,


Learn to labor and to wait.


In other words, the speaker urges individuals / readers to engage in activity.  Life allows for achievement and for pursuit, argues the speaker, and the individual can “Learn to labor and to wait.”


The ambiguity of the final line has led critics to question what the speaker is waiting for. A common interpretation is that the speaker is suggesting that individuals can lead active lives on Earth while simultaneously waiting for their eternal life spent in heaven.

Describe Theseus and Hippolyta in "A Midsummer Night's Dream".

They're odd characters - only appearing at the start and at the end of the play. And it is the gap between these two appearances that seem to make the most difference to the way that they react to each other.


When they first enter, Theseus refers to having wooed Hippolyta (to whom he is to be married in a few days) "with my sword". He has conquered her in a war, and taken her as his bride. Those first lines of the play, before Egeus enters, are oddly transparent. Does Hippolyta resent her husband? Are the two in love? Is the conversation awkward? All interpretations can be played across the text.


It's not until 4.1 that the two appear again, now together outside, and hunting, Hippolyta making her famous comment on the music of the dogs' barking: "So musical a discord, such sweet thunder" (4.1.116-17). Happening upon the lovers, Theseus then over-rules Egeus and lifts the decree which insists that Hermia married Demetrius.


What has changed in the mean time which explains this personality change? Not a great deal, unless you argue that Hippolyta/Theseus have been "translated" (a key word in the play) into Titania/Oberon - and that their suppressed frustration in the first scene becomes the barely-controlled fury of Titania and Oberon's argument. But that's a different story.


Hippolyta and Theseus close the play watching the mechanicals' performance - though, as they head off to bed at the end, I'd conclude them, in the lovers' words, "strange and admirable" characters.

What is the exposition, conflict, inciting incident, climax, conclusion/resolution and denouement of the story "The Princess and the Puma" by O Henry?

The exposition (or background information) of the story is that there is a very wealthy cattle rancher who has a daughter, Josefa, who is very skilled at riding and shooting.


Rising action occurs when Ripley, foreman of one of the cattle outfits owned by Josefa's dad, decides to propose to her.  H e makes the long journey to her house.  On the way, he hears a mountain lion, and the inciting incident is when he sees Josefa at the watering hole about to be pounced on by the lion, and jumps in-between the two. Josefa shoots it mid-air, and the dead lion lands on top of him in an embarrassing scuffle.  Given's pride is wounded; more rising action occurs when he lies and says the lion was "Bill", his pet of 2 years.  She indicates that she believes him, and is impressed that he would have risked his life for a pet.  He offers to ride her home, then leaves.  In the story's climax, when she gets home she tells her father that she had just shot the infamous "Gotch-eared devil", a mean mountain lion known for a patch of ear missing.  So, she had lied to Givens so as to not wound his pride.


With O. Henry, the climax and denouement (or falling action, or resolution) is always tricky, because he usually has a surprise ending that is the most climatic moment of the story.  So, with the climax being at the end, there really is no denouement.  If you want to shift the climax to the mountain lion pounce, then everything after that would be the denouement.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

In the novel "Ender's Game," what does it mean to be iced?

Ender has arrived at Battle School and is receiving orientation from Dap.  Dap tells them that if they break the rules and injure anyone on purpose they will get "iced-out." 

 "What's icing out?" asked the boy with his arm puffed up in a splint.

"Ice.  Put out in the cold.  Sent Earthside.  Finished at Battle School."

"Nobody looked at Ender.

"So boys, if any of you are thinking of being troublemakers, at least be clever about it. Ok?"

So, according to the orientation Dap gave to the new boys at Battle School Iced means to flunk out of school.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

What is a simile and metaphor?

Simile and Metaphor are both classified under


"Figures Based on Similarity" :-



A) SIMILE  :- A simile is the expression of an detailed resemblance between  two objects which are originally dissimilar in nature. The resemblance between those two things must be distinctly stated with "like", "as", "such", "so", etc.


Eg:-The child shows the man, as morning shows the day.(J.Milton)



B) METAPHOR :- By this figure of speech, a word is transferred from the object to which it properly belongs to another object in such a way that a comparison is implied, though not formally expressed. High suggestiveness is a special characteristic of a good metaphor.


Eg:-He is the pillar of his state.



[ Footnote :-   A metaphor differs from a simile only in form and not in substance. The point of resemblance is clearly stated in a simile whereas in a metaphor it is just hinted or implied.


Red as a rose is she   -   Simile


A rose is she               -   Metaphor


A metaphor can be expanded into a simile. Similarly, a simile can be condensed into a metaphor. Hence, a metaphor is an implied simile.  ]



Hope this answers all the doubts --- HAPPY STUDYING  !!!

What is the falling action in the book The Face on the Milk Carton?Please help

The falling action in the book occurs after Lizzie has explained Janie's kidnapping to the Johnsons.  As Janie's parents process the information, we watch them experience intense, conflicting emotions.  We see Janie's relief and worry as she waits to see what course of action they choose to take.  Finally, we witness Janie's inner turmoil as her mother dials her New Jersey family and hands her the phone.

Please explain the term "Postmodernism."

The term postmodern is described by Merriam Websteer as meaning either "of, relating to, or being an era after a modern one" or "of, relating to, or being any of various movements in reaction to modernism that are typically characterized by a return to traditional materials and forms (as in architecture) or by ironic self-reference and absurdity (as in literature)", or finally "of, relating to, or being a theory that involves a radical reappraisal of modern assumptions about culture, identity, history, or language".


Postmodernism was originally a reaction to modernism, largely influenced by the Western European "disillusionment" induced by World WarII. Both World Wars contributed to postmodernism; it is with the end of the Second World War that recognizably postmodernist attitudes begin to emerge. Postmodernism tends to refer to a cultural, intellectual, or artistic state lacking a clear central hierarchy or organizing principle and embodying extreme complexity, contradiction, ambiguity, diversity, interconnectedness or interreferentiality, in a way that is often indistinguishable from a parody of itself.


The term was applied to a whole host of movements, many in art, music, and literature, that reacted against modernism, and are typically marked by revival of traditional elements and techniques. Postmodernist ideas in  philosohy and the analysis of culture and society expanded the importance of criticaltheory and has been the point of departure for works of literature architecture, and design as well as being visible in marketing/business and the interpretation of history   and culture, starting in the late 20th century.


Art and literature of the early part of the 20th century play a significant part in shaping the character of postmodern culture. Dadaism attacked notions of high art in an attempt to break down the distinctions between high and low culture; Surrealism  further developed concepts of Dadaism to celebrate the flow of the subconscious with influential techniques such as automatism and nonsensical juxtapositions.

In "Fahrenheit 451" Montag's reaction to the commercial on the subway is a turning point in his life? How does he react and why?

A lot has been building up inside Montag before he gets onto the subway, and the commercial he hears there is just the final straw, the final push that snaps him over the edge.  Before this, he had met Clarisse and really started thinking about things for the first time, only to have her disappear.  He had pondered the empty nature of his marriage, Mildred's unhappiness, and the seeming meaningless of everyone's lives.  He had burned Mrs. Blake's house, been confronted by Beatty, and was on the brink of going back to his old ways.


While on the subway, he wants to read the book he's taken before he gives it back to Beatty; he thinks that "no phrase must escape me, each line must be memorized".  So, he is trying to concentrate on the book, to let it sink in, to memorize it.  He is discontented, but no thoughts of full-on rebellion have hit yet.  He is planning on returning the book, resuming life.  However, the commercial keeps interrupting his thoughts.  He can't absorb the book.  The commercial keeps pounding out any thought at all, other than its jingle and catch-phrase.  He realizes that this is why his society is unhappy but doesn't act:  "The people were pounded into submission" by sensory overload.  This realization awakens him, and prompts him to go to Faber, where full plans for rebellion are laid.

Monday, May 20, 2013

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what does Scout come to realize while standing on the Radley's porch at the end of the novel?

At the end of the novel, after walking Arthur "Boo" Radley home, Scout looks out at the view of town from the Radley's front porch.  She notices just how much Boo could see just by looking out the window, since, being a recluse, was his only means of experiencing the world. 

She also notices just how clear the view of her house was, as well as the tree.  Recalling all the times she, Jem, and dill spent playing in plain view of the house, she realizes that in a sense, they were "Boo's kids", and he was actively a part of their lives, if only from the outside looking in. 

It's really a touching/moving part of the novel, as it directly follows a much-anticipated meeting of Scout and Boo for the first time.  He saved she and Jem from certain death at the hands of Bob Ewell, even killing the attacker in order to ensure the children's safety.  Scout has a new understanding of her friend and guardian, and learns a great deal about how others can be an active part of our lives, if even unknowingly. 

What forces can produce a nonzero net force, which changes an object's motion?

Exerting any type of force on an object will alter its acceleration.  In the case of an object at rest, a force applied to it may not cause it to accelerate immediately, as the applied force may be being countered by the force of friction; in this case, the forces are "balanced" and inertia isn't altered. However, as soon as the applied force is greater than the frictional force, inertia is overcome and the object will accelerate. In the case of the force of gravity, objects revolving around a star, for example, are constantly "falling" towards it due to gravitational attraction, but are also constantly altering their motion and end orbiting around rather than joining with the more massive body.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Whom would you consider in the story as a foil to the Capulet family nurse?A foil is a character that contrasts with another character and so...

Well, I think a foil can also be someone similar to the main character in certain ways, that is, in some key way, a reflection of them. Otherwise, for example, the Prince would be a good foil to the nurse - he's nothing like her, he's in control, unlike her, ... you get my point.


I think the best foil - and the most obvious "pair" with the Nurse - is Friar Laurence. Why?


Firstly, because the two of them are crucially the only understanding adults in the play: both of them are the generation above Romeo and Juliet. They are, moreover, the only two adults who are entrusted (by Romeo and Juliet) respectively with the information about their love and marriage.


Both of them provide advice which is then followed, and both of them actually interfere with the course of events: the Friar actually performs the marriage ceremony, and the Nurse carries messages between Romeo and Juliet.


And lastly, in the event of everything going wrong, both of them eventually resort to cowardly, backing-out-of-it advice. Here's the Nurse:



I think it best you married with the County.
O, he's a lovely gentleman!
Romeo's a dishclout to him.



And here's Friar Laurence:



Come, I'll dispose of thee
Among a sisterhood of holy nuns.
Stay not to question...



There's even a moment when Shakespeare mirrors the two characters explicitly:



NURSE:
Where is my lady's lord, where's Romeo?


FRIAR:
There on the ground, with his own tears made drunk.

NURSE:
O, he is even in my mistress’ case,
Just in her case!


Who is the antagonist in "False Gems" by Guy De Maupassant?

This short story by Guy de Maupassant is also known as "The Jewelry."


There really cannot be said to be any antagonist in this story. The two principal characters are M. Lantin and his wife. The husband, of course, has always been taken for the "injured party" simply because of the shock of realization when he discovers the truth about his wife.


However, this does not automatically make the wife the antagonist. After all, consider these factors: The Lantins could live in ease because of the added (and unknown) income of the wife. During their life together, M. Lantin is probably the happiest husband one could think of. After the death of the wife, she still adds to Lantin's happiness by enabling him to become a rich man, leave his job, take a second wife.


If the reader insists on having an antagonist to the story, one may be found at the closing lines of the story. The second wife: She made M. Lantin miserable.


See my full article. Link provided.

What is the summery of "The Open Window"?

Framton Nuttel, who suffers from a nervous condition, has gone to the country on the advice of his doctor  and with the assistance of his sister, who has written letters of introduction for him so that he can call on people.


He goes to the home of the Sappleton family and is greeted by the niece, 15 year old, Vera.  While Nuttel and Vera wait for Mrs. Sappleton to join them, she tells him a story about why her aunt keeps the window open.


Vera explains to Nuttel that it is the 3rd anniversary of the Hunting Party's mysterious disappearance in the Bog.  Her Uncles and their dog went hunting on this very day three years ago and have not returned.  So as a memorial, in the hope that they will return, her aunt, Mrs. Sappleton keeps the window open, since that is the way the hunting party entered the house.


The story makes Nuttel very uneasy, he is a nervous man. When Mrs. Sappleton joins them, she explains that she is waiting for her husband and brothers to return from hunting.  He immediately thinks that she is crazy, according to Vera, the hunting party went out 3 years ago. 


All of a sudden, Nuttel spots the hunting party coming towards the house, Mrs. Sappleton acknowledges their return, expecting them, Vera looks shocked, Nuttel panics, runs out of the house believing that he has seen ghosts.  He rushes past Mrs. Sappleton without a word, Vera explains that he was afraid of the dog that is why he made such a quick exit. 

What are three characteristics that Leslie and Jess both have in "Bridge to Terabithia"? Expand.

Jess and Leslie both share a love for running.  Jess is a good runner who aspires to be the fastest runner in his class.  Leslie is a great runner who manages to beat even all the boys the first time she races them.

Both Jess and Leslie have very creative personalities.  Jess is an artist, and although his work is generally unappreciated by the people in his life, he draws "the way some people drink whiskey".  When he has a chance to retire to his room with his artist's materials, "the peace would start at the top of his muddled brain and seep down through his tired and tensed-up body...Lord, he loved to draw...animals, mostly...not regular animals...but crazy animals with problems...(in) impossible fixes" (Chapter 2).  Leslie's creativity shows in her storytelling.  Terabithia with all its situations and characters are driven largely because of her ability to create magic through her imagination.

Perhaps the most significant characteristic Jess and Leslie share is their need for "a place...just for us".  Both children have difficulties at home.  Jess is the overlooked only son in a family of demanding sisters; he is often taken-advantage-of when his siblings refuse to do their share, and his own needs are frequently overlooked.  Leslie's parents live a unique lifestyle which makes her an outcast with the kids at school.  Both Leslie and Jess feel the need to have some control over their lives, and at Terabithia, at least, they can be "ruler(s) of something" (Chapter 4).

Saturday, May 18, 2013

In To Sir With Love, Braithwaite paints a picture of working class England in the 1960s. How would you describe this class?

In Chapter I, Ricardo "Rick" Braithwaite rides on a double-decker bus with women who are returning from their shopping, and he smells fish.



...earthy charwomen...thick-armed, bovine women,...with heavy bodies irrevocably distorted by frequent childbearing. ...There was a look of indestructibility about them, from the tip of each tinted hed in its gaudy headscarf...to the solid legs and large feet which seemed rooted in the earth.



Clearly of London's lower-class, these women joke with the driver with lewdness despite Braithwaite's presence. He feels that they do not care if he hears them,



...these people who had lived too intimately with poverty and danger and death would not be easily embarrassed.



His romantic notions of the East End, about which Chaucer had written and where on the reach of the Thames, Captain John Smith had sailed for America where he founded the Virginia Colony, are shattered as Braithwaite views areas still shattered from World War II's bombings by the Germans and gaudy shops and noisy streets littered with debris. All sorts of smells arise from the shops and from the garbage.


Braithwaite soon learns, too, that although people such as he are allowed to move from the British colonies into England, they are not accepted as equals. When, for instance, he tries to rent a flat, the landlady turns him down after she sees that he is black. Yet, they are not hypocritical in their actions.


After Braithwaite takes a position at Greenslade Secondary School, located in an alleyway amid dirty structures and "dilapidated lodging houses." He is surprised by the appearances of his students, for the girls dress rather seductively; others are disheveled and poorly clothed; furthermore, these students are often insolent and uncouth. They smoke and use bad language and lack manners. Mr. Florian, the principal, explains to his new teacher that many of the students have no breakfast and have slept in a stuffy, overcrowded room all night. Some of their fathers do not even work; instead, they drink and roam the streets. Outside the school, prostitutes, pimps, perverts and "social vermin" roam, Florian says. 




Friday, May 17, 2013

In Oedipus Rex, according to Ode 1, which god will inevitably punish the murderer of Laius?

Although Athene, Artemis, and Apollo are called upon in this Ode to help the people of Thebes, it is ultimately Zeus who is called upon to slay the murderer of King Laius.


Father Zeus, whose hand
Doth wield the lightning brand,

Slay him beneath thy levin bold, we pray,

Slay him, O slay!


King Laius had been killed at a crossroads when he and Oedipus met and each refused to give the right of way on the road to the other.  Odepius killed Laius and then arrived in Thebes.  He was ultimately was given the crown of Thebes and the widowed queen as his wife when he solved the riddle of the Sphinx.  Oedipus did not know the man he killed was the king, not did he know that Laius was his biological father, and the woman he married, Jocasta, was his biological mother.

Why did a republican movement emerge in France in the years 1789-1792?

The short answer, of course, is that the French population felt oppressed by their government and had generally felt so since the Middle Ages, combined with inspiration provided by the successful American Revolution and the writings of Thomas Paine.  The general concepts of the Enlightenment also contributed, since in the preceeding century King Louis XIV had revoked the rights of Protestants, instituting a period in which many began more serious criticism of the "rights" and competence of the nobility.  These criticisms came not only from dissidents and the poor, but from the middle class and philosophers, most notably Rousseau and Voltaire.  Much of this philosophy was used as a cover for the self-interests of the middle class, but the example of these men and the admiration by the French of the American leaders and the concepts of equality and constitutional rights sounded pretty good to those who were downtrodden or felt so in France, who were a very large segment of the population.  This plus the admiration of America among a portion of the nobility itself added to the ferment.


The economic causes were more complex.  France was a quite industrialised society, lagging only behind England, and wealthier than most European nations.  But the concentration of wealth at the top of society left a large class of poor, and the squandering of the money in great opulence by the wealthy in personal aggrandizement did not effectively stimulate the economy.  These things led to a credit and cash crisis lasting decades, with France as a functioning nation nearly bankrupt on the eve of the Revolution.


In addition, there was a tradition of revolt in France dating back to the 14th Century.  See Barbara Tuchman"s book, "A Distant Mirror" for information on the Jacquerie and other contemporary revolts.

What would be a good thesis with three points of support for Steinbeck's The Pearl?

Your essay will be stronger if you write your thesis yourself, but here are some ideas: 

You may want to write a thesis that states that Steinbeck's 'The Pearl" is a parable (or fable, if you wish) of how individuals relate to the world. Your three points could show the main ways in which Kino's relation to the world changes. 

Of course, his finding of the Pearl of the World alters the attitudes of others, but his attitude also changes greatly.  For instance, when it is suggested that he be rid of the pearl, Kino declares, "The pearl has become my soul...If I give it up I shall lose my soul."  However, the greater evil seems to be his greed and holding onto the pearl without offering to share any of the wealth as well as his becoming a target of hit men. 

Check out the questions and answers on this book as well as the discussion group; two good links are listed below that may help.

How does the socio-economic reality of the late 1920's manifest itself in Of Mice and Men?

California in the 1930s was not representative of the entire United States. California only had a population of around two-and-a-half million at that time, compared to over 35,000,000 million now. It was an agricultural state. It produced fabulous crops of nearly everythinig, including fruits and nuts, but shipping was primitive. The majority of the American population lived east of the Mississippi. It was nearly impossible to ship food without having it decay en route to the big markets on the East Coast. Trains took at least three days to cross the U.S., and that was in good weather. Refrigerated freight cars were not at all common, and refrigeration built up the cost of food to Eastern consumers. Big 18-wheeler long-haul trucks did not exist. The highways were primitive in many states--just two-lane roads with a white stripe down the center, many in poor condition.


The American people were not nearly as well educated as they are today. They were not as well informed, either. Television did not exist until after World War II. And of course there were no computers, wifi, satellites, etc. Radio was mostly local. Movies were not informative. They were just escapist entertainment with no real content. Shirley Temple became the top star in the 1930s.


The men portrayed in Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men were ignorant and unskilled. Most had never been to high school, as can be deduced from the way they talk in Steinbeck’s novella. Some were illiterate or barely literate. Steinbeck includes a little scene in which one man shows another a pulp magazine to illustrate the level of their reading interests.



"'Dear Editor," Slim read slowly. "'I read your mag for six years and I think it is the best on the market. I like stories by Peter Rand. I think he is a whing-ding. Give us more like the Dark Rider. I don't write many letters. Just thought I would tell you I think your mag is the best dime's worth I ever spent.'"



These magazines get passed around and around and finally end up in Crooks' room after everybody else has read them and they are pretty much worn out.


For men like those portrayed by Steinbeck, the Depression didn't make all that much difference. All they had to sell was their hard labor, whether they worked in the country or in the city. Most of the labor-saving machinery had not been invented. If a ditch had to be dug, it was dug by so-called pick-and-shovel workers. Some men used picks to loosen the dirt while others used shovels to shovel it out. There were no bulldozers, forklifts, backhoes, or any other such machines. It is noteworthy that the wagons in Of Mice and Men were pulled by huge teams of horses rather than by simple tractors. Those horses are all gone now.


World War II changed the lives of the farm laborers—especially of those who were white. They could get well-paying jobs in California in building ships, airplanes, and manufacturing munitions, among other things. Many of the younger men went into the military. This created a great labor shortage on the farms. The big ranchers were able to bring in Mexicans under various federal programs, and these migrants have done most of the farm work in California ever since, gradually moving into other jobs as they acquire knowkedge of English.


The Great Depression didn't make much difference for the kind of men Steinbeck portrayed in Of Mice and Men and shortly later in The Grapes of Wrath. World War II transformed California. The state has been booming ever since.

In "Lord of the Flies", compare and contrast the deaths of Simon and Piggy.

Both Simon and Piggy died as a result of the chaos and savagery that overtook the boys on the island. Simon represented the mystic believer who understood things to a greater degree than the others did.  Piggy represented the intellect and common sense.  Both boys stood for the opposite of the evil that was taking over the boys and the island.  Simon died in chapter 9 when he ran into the circle of boys dancing in a frenzy around the fire.  In their mob mentality stirred by the dancing frenzy, the boys fell on Simon and killed him - calling him "the beast". Simon probably wouldn't have been killed if not for what the boys were doing at that moment.  Piggy was killed in chapter 11 while trying to talk sense into Jack and his henchmen. Piggy's death was deliberate but still occurred in a moment of madness.  Roger purposely leaned on the lever, dislodging the boulder that killed Piggy, but Roger had become fully savage at this point.  As Roger listened to Jack, Ralph and Piggy argue, "...Roger, with a sense of delirious abandonment, leaned all his weight on the lever."  The savage beast within the boys took over the minds and the hearts of the boys and this resulted in the deaths of Simon and Piggy, as well as the deaths of mystic enlightenment and reason.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, how do the duke an the king behave toward each other after they are back on the raft? How would you...

When Huck and Jim first encounter the King and the Duke, the two rogues are working together to come up with ways in which to scam the small town citizens out of their money. They play off of each other and work together to build up their "back story" and to convince others of their lineage and knowledge in certain areas. However, this all changes after the four leave Mary Jane and her family. Once back on the raft the Duke and the King begin arguing and accusing each other of attempting to steal the bag of money from the Wilkes' residence. This is markedly different from earlier because now the two have become suspicious and accusatory of each other, whereas before they were working together. They are particularly mean to Huck and Jim at this time as well.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

What is the meaning of the word "amontillado" in "The Cask of Amontillado"?

An "amontillado" is a type of wine produced in Spain. The first thing that is significant about this is that the story is set in Italy and thus this wine would have been imported, making it substantially more expensive than readily available Italian wines.


Next, amontillado is a type of "sherry." This term is an anglicized version of "Jerez," the Spanish town from which this type of wine originates. Sherries are fortified wines, meaning that extra alcohol is added to the barrels as they age, making their alcohol content approximately 50 percent higher than ordinary wines, with the darker, sweeter sherries having slightly higher alcohol contents than the paler, drier ones.


Sherries range from very dry and pale in color (types termed "fino" and "Manzanilla") to sweeter and darker varieties (including "Oloroso" and "cream"). An amontillado, named after the Montilla region of Spain, is in the middle of the sweetness and color range for sherries, having a medium amber color and a distinctively nutty flavor. It is usually consumed in small quantities as an apperitif rather than accompanying a meal.

My boyfriend is going to jury trial for domestic violence and I have have received a supoena to testify against him. Can I plead the fifth? We got...

The previous answer makes reference to the marital privilege in which communications between spouses can be kept confidential even in court.  However, you do not qualify here because (1) you are not spouses, and even if you were, (2) most jurisdictions recognize an exception to the privilege when one spouse is being charged with a crime as against the other spouse.

The 5th Amendment doesn't protect you here either because that gives you the right not to testify against yourself in a criminal case.  Here, you would be testifying against your boyfriend, not yourself.

Thus, you likely have to testify truthfully if compelled to do so.  Remember that you can do yourself no harm by telling the truth.  If you were to lie under oath to help your boyfriend, you would be subject to criminal charges of perjury.  It would not be worth it.  Best of luck. 

What had Jesus helped Thacia understand about the coming of God's kingdom in "Bronze Bow"?Why does this explanation cause Daniel to get angry?

Jesus had helped Thacia understand that the coming of God's kingdom will be different from what might be expected.  Instead of involving victory in warfare, it instead will manifest itself in a radical change in men's hearts. 

The Jewish people believed that the coming of the kingdom would bring about their deliverance from hated Roman rule.  Daniel himself has devoted his life to seeing that this happens.  When he first heard of Jesus, he had hoped that Jesus would join with Rosh's renegade band and build a great army with which to overthrow the occupiers.  Thacia's explanation of the kingdom Jesus is talking about completely goes against everything for which Daniel has worked.

According to Thacia, God's kingdom may come "without any fighting", and that the Jews "don't have to wait for God to care for (them)...He does that now...every one of us".  Thacia has learned from Jesus that "God sees into our hearts and loves us...every man and woman".  This concept leads to the conclusion that perhaps God loves the Romans too.

Daniel is incensed by this idea.  Having seen the ruthless hand with which the Romans have victimized the Jews for so long, Daniel harbors a deep and abiding hatred for them.  The thought that all people - Romans and Jews alike - might be called to live in harmony is too much for him, but perhaps more importantly, "Thacia's words had come close to his own secret doubts" as well (Chapter 16).

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

How can you determine when a protagonist is presented directly or indirectly in a given story?

This is an issue of knowing the types of characterization.  First you have direct characterization, which is done through the techniques of giving vivid descriptions and using direct narration (storytelling).  Then, you have indirect characterization, which includes the following techniques: using dialogue with other characters to give information to readers about a character, using that character's actions to help readers understand him/her better, and finally, the use of other characters' comments about that character in the story in order to make clear the attributes of the character in question.


So, it's really an issue of figuring out how the author is presenting the character.  Which of the techniques of characterization as listed above does the author use to tell you about the protagonist?  Once you determine that, figure out whether it falls under the umbrella of direct or that of indirect.  It's as simple as that!  Although, you may want to have some quotes available to back up your opinion.  Good luck!

In "Fahrenheit 451", what happened to Monta's green bullet?

At Montag's burning house, Montag and Beatty fight.  During the scuffle, Montag's green bullet falls out of his ear and hits the ground.  From there, "Beatty snatched it up, grinning...switched the green bullet off and thrust it in his pocket."  He then threatens to trace the signal, to find Montag's friend, Faber.  This is the last straw for Montag.  They burned his house, were trying to take him, and now Beatty threatened Faber's safety.  This is the point where Montag loses it and threatens Beatty with the flame-thrower.  Beatty taunts him, and Montag torches him.  So in the end, his green bullet gets burnt, along with Beatty, by Montag himself.

Where in the Odyssey does it say what Penelope looks like? Can you quote and page number it for me? I'm doing a project for English about Penelope,...

The only place where Penelope is described physically is in Book 17.  But there it is not very clear, either.  She is compared to Diana and Venus in the following line:  "Penelope came out of her room looking like Diana or Venus."  In other books, she is wearing a veil to hide her face (which is customary for women in this era) whenever she is seen in public with the suitors.  Homer never gives her any physical description that I can find, and I have searched EACH book of The Odyssey.   She is defined in this epic by her actions.  That is why she is the perfect wife for the hero.  She is clever, strong, and ever faithful to her long, lost husband.  You can perhaps go to book 18 where Athena puts Penelope into a deep sleep and then lavishes her in beauty so that she may mystify the suitors when she makes her appearance.

"Then the goddess shed grace and beauty over her that all the Achaeans might admire her. She washed her face with the ambrosial loveliness that Venus wears when she goes dancing with the Graces; she made her taller and of a more commanding figure, while as for her complexion it was whiter than sawn ivory."

You can do what you need to with that, but her actual appearance is never fully explained.  Again, Homer used actions and personalities to describe, not physical descriptions.  Perhaps you could discuss how her appearance is worsened by her crying--that is repeated a lot, too.

Monday, May 13, 2013

From what point of view is "My Last Duchess" told, and is it about Browning's late wife?

It is told in the 3rd person, with a limited narrator.  It is the duke himself speaking, and that is the only perspective we get.  It is just a monologue of his thoughts and perspectives.  So, his guest's thoughts are never portrayed, and we have to infer what the guest is thinking based on what the duke says.  For example, at the end, we can guess that the guest was attempting to leave when the duke states, "Nay, we'll go together down, sir,".  He wants his guest to wait, to not be so anxious to leave.  Because of this limited perspective, it gives us a really great glimpse into the psyche of the duke, but very little into the actual reality or facts of what he is speaking about.  We don't know for sure if his first wife was too flirtatious or unfaithful as the duke implies, because it is just his perceptions.

There is no evidence to suggest that the poem is about Robert Browning's first wife; rather, it is speaking of the narrator's first wife,the man that Browning creates to tell the story.  Browning had a knack for creating creepy characters who go to great lengths to secure love, and the duke is a great example of that.

In Fahrenheit 451", how are the books being saved?

There are two ways that books are being saved in the novel. The first is that people are hiding them in their houses, which is the less effective of the ways. Most of the book is about the consequences of being caught with books in your house. The second way isn't introduced until the end of the novel, but is key in understanding the themes of the novel. Montag joins a group of renegades, most of whom are artists, professors, or philosophers. They have been memorizing the texts of classics books, each taking responsibility for remembering different pieces of literature. They know that a time will come when society will need the words and philosophies from these books, and are preserving them in their minds for that day.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Explain each of the following from Ch 3 of "A Separate Peace": Super Suicide Society, blitzball, and A. Hopkins Parker,1940 Tell what it is,...

In Chapter 3 Phineas creates blitzball, a game designed for his tremendous athletic ability.  He names this game after the German blitzkrieg, the swift and overwhelming air attacks used by the Germans in World War II.  Finny has the players run swiftly with a round ball; others can knock into the ball carrier, but they must not use their arms.  Gene tells the reader, "There was nothing to do but start running...with the others trampling with stronger will around me."  There are no teams: "we're all enemies.  Knock him down!" declares Finny.

Like blitzball, the Super Suicide Society involves daring and risk.  Finny forms this group, as well.  They gather at the river, climb a tree and jump from a limb, on which they balance and move forward,  into the river. 

A. Hopkins Parker, 1940, is an allusion to the swimmer at Devon who swam the 100 yard free-style in 53.0 seconds in 1940.  Finny, however, breaks this record by .7 second.  He did this unofficially and when Gene asks him to do it again for a reporter for The Devonian, Finny refuses:  "I just wanted to see if I could do it. Now I know.  But I don't want to do it in public."

Who are the people Holden likes in " The Catcher in the Rye" and why?

One person that Holden obviously likes is his brother, Allie. Allie died before the content of the novel takes place. In the beginning of the novel, Holden rhapsodizes about how Allie was one of the best people in the world. His poetry clad baseball glove is Holden's prized possession.

A second person that Holden likes is his sister Phoebe. The significance of these two likings is that Holden seems to like younger, innocent people. He doesn't much care for adults.

How could Dickens cure a character of being a miser in "A Christmas Carol"?

The old saying, "Seeing is believing" is the start.  Four ghosts visit him...Marley, Scrooge's old business partner, is the first.  When Scrooge sees how Marley's ghost is weighed down by chains and the symbols of their business together, and Marley tells him how he must wander for eternity and that Scrooge's chain will be twice as long and heavy as Marley's, Scrooge begins to pay attention.  It is not until he travels back in time to Christmas Past, visits Christmas Present and Christmas Future that Scrooge not only sees, but feels.  Those feelings of being loved then abandoned were true to him.  The feeling of joy he feels toward his little sister, his one-time fiancee, and his old boss, Mr. Fezziwig reminds him of how life used to be and could be again.  The pain he senses in his nephew's house and in the Cratchit household because of Tiny Tim also makes a dent in his icy demeanor.  Scrooge winces when the ghosts use his own words against him at crucial times in the play, and he realizes that he could change things so they wouldn't be quite so horrible for not only himself but for his family and the family of his employee, Bob Cratchit.  It is with this newfound knowledge and sense of humanity that he awakens after the third ghost has left to rejoice that he hadn't missed Christmas.  He begins spending a little money and spreading happiness...changing the future for many. 

Saturday, May 11, 2013

What morals and deeper meanings are explored in A Christmas Carol?

Authors generally convey a message through their characters, and Dickens was no different. We are supposed to learn a lesson from Scrooge, just as Marley tries to teach Scrooge to learn a lesson from his own fate.


Scrooge is a snobby, stingy, selfish jerk, to be plain. Throughout the novel, he is confronted with his own shortcomings; as he examines them, so does the reader. We are to learn from Scrooge's life just as he learns from it. Here are some examples from his visits:


Marley - tells Scrooge that people should have been his business in life, and that he has forged the painful chain he wears in death by his callousness. He warns Scrooge not to repeat the same mistakes he made in life.


Ghost of Christmas Past - reminds Scrooge that he wasn't always miserable and alone; he was once hopeful, and he had friends. During childhood, his father sent him away, but he had a sister who loved him. During his youth, he had his generous employer Fezziwig and other work friends.


Ghost of Christmas Present - reminds Scrooge to live in the here and now. Shows him that his life is good compared to others around him, and yet they're happy and he's miserable. Shows him what it means to be grateful for what you have.


Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come - shows Scrooge that he is doomed to die alone if he doesn't change his ways and reach out to his fellow man.


As Scrooge learns these lessons, so can we.

How many tragedies did Shakespeare write, and what are some of the titles?

There is a simple answer to the question and a complex answer. The simple answer is that there are ten plays credited to Shakespeare that are generally considered tragedies. They are: 


  1. Antony and Cleopatra

  2. Coriolanus

  3. Hamlet

  4. Julius Caesar

  5. King Lear

  6. Macbeth

  7. Othello

  8. Romeo and Juliet

  9. Timon of Athens 

  10. Titus Andronicus

These plays are generally considered tragedies because they do not end happily. Instead they end with multiple characters dying and those left behind left to mourn and ask what they could have done differently. Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth and King Lear and generally considered Shakespeare's four great tragedies. 


The moe complex answer to this questions depends on what definition of tragedy you are using. Aristotle, a Greek philosopher who lived and wrote between 384 and 322 BCE, wrote a book on poetry and drama called Poetics. In that book Aristotle described a tragedy as a piece the aroused feelings of pity and fear in the audience and then provides a catharsis, or a release of those emotions for audience members. The plays listed above meet this criteria as well; each play deals with issues that can bring up pity and fear in an audience, like loss of family, ambition, familial expectations, jealousy, loyalty and love.


Another definition of tragedy relies on the economic and political position of the main character. In this definition, the pieces needs to have a tragic hero, someone of noble birth who has admirable or heroic qualities but who falls or fails because of fate or a tragic flaw that destroys them. Tragedies tell the stories of the fall, failure or death of royalty, of queens, kings, princes and princesses. Stories that describe the fall, failure or death of non-royal characters are called melodramas. The definition and use of the word melodrama has changed and is now used to describe exaggerated plots with stock characters. But historically it was a piece where the characters who suffered were not royalty. Using this definition Coriolanus, Romeo and Juliet and Timon of Athens from the list of tragedies since the main characters in these pieces are not of noble birth. 


The playwright Arthur Miller (Death of a Salesman, All My Sons, The Crucible) wrote an essay called Tragedy and the Common Man, in which he argued that any person could be a tragic hero. He called his play Death of a Salesman a tragedy because even though his main character was not noble he was a tragic hero with noble qualities who fell at the end of the piece. 

Friday, May 10, 2013

Do internal environments of males and females differ? Explain.

Males and females do have differences. Their brains differ in size and in basic functioning. The male is controlled by what is called a "hunter's instinct", and the female is controlled by what is called a "nurturer's instinct". Thought processes also differ between the sexes. Males deal more with facts, problems, and solutions which he generally handles on his own. Females deal more with emotions and dealing with problems by talking about them with someone else. 


There are also the obvious physical differences. Males have more muscle mass and females tend to have more fat stores. Males are as a generally physically stronger than females.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

What is the metaphor in lines 7-9 of the poem "Ode to the West Wind"?

I can see why you're having problems. Because of Shelley's love of enjambment (continuing the sense of a line onto the next line) the poetic devices actually extend back further than line 7, and on further than line 9.

O thou,
Who chariotest to their dark wintry bed

The winged seeds, where they lie cold and low...

That's the first sense unit. Shelley addresses the wind (O thou) who acts like a "chariot", taking the seeds to their "bed" (of soil, we assume) where they lie cold and low. Then he picks up the pun on bed (human bed / flowerbed) and takes it further:

Each like a corpse within its grave, until
Thine azure sister of the Spring shall blow

Her clarion o'er the dreaming earth, and fill
(Driving sweet buds like flocks to feed in air)
With living hues and odours plain and hill...

Each seed lies like a corpse in the grave, until the wind's blue ("azure") sister, "the Spring", blows her trumpet ("clarion") over the earth. This metaphorical trumpet fills both plain and hill full of living colours ("hues") and smells ("odours").

SO the simile compares the seed lying in a seedbed to a grave, until the trumpet of Spring (this is the metaphor!) fills the "corpse" full of life. It's basically a reference to Revelation in the Bible, when God is supposed to raise up the dead to redemption.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

The theme of the evil of manipulation recurs in a number of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s stories. In the novel The Scarlet Letter, how is this theme...

Hawthorne is interested in showing the effects of guilt on the human psyche in his novel The Scarlet Letter. Each of the three main adult characters, Hester, Roger Chillingworth, and the Reverend Dimmesdale suffer from different kinds of guilt. It is Chillingworth’s guilt that is important to the theme of manipulation in the story.


Early in the novel, Hester is forced to stand upon the scaffold with her infant as punishment for her crime of adultery. Coincidentally, this happens on the same day that her much older husband arrives unannounced in Boston for the first time. When he sees what Hester has done in his absence, he makes her promise not to reveal that he is her husband. He also asks her who the father of the child is, but Hester refuses to name the Reverend Dimmesdale, which leads to the following passage from chapter 5:


“Thou wilt not reveal his name? Not the less he is mine,” resumed he [Chillingworth] with a look of confidence, as if destiny were at one with him.


This passage sets up Chillingworth’s character and motivations for the rest of the story. Once he suspects that his target is the Reverend Dimmesdale, he devotes himself to manipulating Dimmesdale for the purpose of making his life miserable. Since Dimmesdale’s health takes a turn for the worse after Hester’s public humiliation, Chillingworth becomes his personal physician and then his housemate. This leads to a close personal relationship in which Chillingworth becomes Dimmesdale’s confidant. All the while, Chillingworth uses his position of physician to actually make Dimmesdale sicker that he would be otherwise.


Dimmesdale remains ignorant of Chillingworth’s true identity and intentions until chapter 17, when a chance meeting in the forest with Hester finally brings out the truth. Hester, seeing how Dimmesdale has been destroyed by his guilt, much of which has been magnified by Chillingworth’s physical and psychological manipulations, finally breaks her vow of secrecy to Chillingworth and tells Dimmesdale the truth.


“O Arthur,” cried she, “forgive me. In all things else, I have striven to be true! Truth was the one virtue which I might have held fast, and did hold fast, through all extremity; save when thy good—thy life—thy fame—were put in question!  Then I consented to a deception. But a lie is never good, even though death threaten on the other side! Dost thou not see what I would say? That old man!—the physician!—he whom they call Roger Chillingworth!—he was my husband!”


As we can see from the passion of Hester’s revelation, she has suffered as a result of her promise to keep Chillingworth’s secret, because she knows that this secret has made Dimmesdale’s torment worse.


After this revelation, Dimmesdale changes irrevocably. Although he is now free of Chillingworth’s machinations, he is still guilty of betraying himself and his flock through adultery. He soon confesses to the townspeople and dies on the scaffold, thanking God for his mercy.


As for the great manipulator Chillingworth, once Dimmesdale dies he no longer has any reason to live.  “All his strength and energy—all his vital and intellectual force—seemed at once to desert him.” He dies within the year. All of his manipulations have served only to leave him empty and broken. Ironically, Dimmesdale dies believing that his sufferings have brought him closer to God.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

What is Jack's response or orders to the group as soon as he sees Piggy and Ralph?

Are you talking about the end of the book? If so, here's what happens:


Ralph and Piggy, the only ones left of their group after the other boys have all joined Jack's tribe (either because they wanted to or by force, as with Sam'n'Eric), go to see Jack to try and get Piggy's glasses back.


When Jack sees Ralph and Piggy approaching, he orders the group to prepare to release the boulder on Castle Rock through the operation of a lever - presumably to kill Ralph. It ends up killing Piggy instead by sending him off the cliff. Roger is the one who releases the lever.

Please provide me with a full summary of "Kubla Khan" by Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

This is certainly a rather confusing poem in lots of ways, as it defies any kind of meaning that we would try to impose on it because of its fantastical nature, so I am not surprised you are struggling to understand it! I will provide you with a summary of the poem that will hopefully enable you to gain a basic understanding of what the poem is talking about so you can begin to perhaps understand it.


It is important to remember that Coleridge apparently experienced the vision of what he writes about during an opium-inspired dream, and then woke up and wrote down the experience in this poem. This may explain the strong visual element of this poem. The speaker states that Kubla Khan has built a majestic pleasure dome in Xanadu, with gardens, forests and winding streams. Artificiality (man-made creation) and nature sit side by side, and deep in a chasm a fountain bursts forth, which sends the sacred river Alph into a motionless ocean. Alongside the voice of this river, the Khan, we are told, hears voices that predict war.


The next stanza then shifts to a vision of an Abyssinian woman playing a dulcimer. This inspires the speaker to try to recapture her music and through this re-create the pleasure dome at Xanadu, which would inspire awe and fear in people as they marvel at the speaker's act of creation.


Hope this helps! It is a complicated poem, but the rhythm and use of alliteration make it a very easy poem to memorise.

What point of view was the story told in?In Poe's "The Pit and the Pendulum."

This story is told from the first person limited point of view.  The narrator is a prisoner being held in captivity during the Spanish Inquisition until conquering soldiers come and rescue him.


The fact that the narrator doesn't know much about his surroundings while in the pit and has to grope around to "visualize" his situation increases the sense of horror (especially when he almost falls into the pit unaware).


Check out the following references for more details concerning Poe's use of point of view in this particular short story to create effect.

Monday, May 6, 2013

How does Poe develop "The Masque of the Red Death" to build a feeling of terror?

Poe uses the narrative events plus allusions to the Bible and Shakespeare to create a classic gothic tale of horror. The story begins with a "pestilence" of Biblical proportions raving some unknown land. Its leader, Prince Prospero, a name probably borrowed from Shakespeare's "The Tempest" decides he will invite his friends into his castle and party while other die outside his castle gates. The description of the Red Death is horrible enough. One bleeds from every pore in the body and suffers "hideous" pain. However, like the Duke Prospero, in "The Tempest", Prince Prospero isolates himself and his friends and expects to escape the "Red Death". Somehow the audience knows better. Poe then describes the decision to hold a masquerade ball. The rooms in which the ball was held are equally intriguing. Each one has a different color, especially the last room which is decorated in black and has a black clock which chimes every hour. This sets up anticipation of some horrid ending. When the Red Death appears, Poe uses Biblical language to reinforce fear in both the reader and the guests. He writes, the Red Death,"‘‘like a thief in the night.’ By the end of the story, the Biblical language becomes evident."And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. "The blood and the dew of the plague replace the blood of Christ and the dew of heaven" and "Darkness and Decay and the Red Death" rule.

During approximately what year does To Kill a Mockingbird take place?

In the beginning of the novel, Scout says that they had recently been told "they had nothing to fear but fear itself."  This line came from Franklin Roosevelt's first Inaugural Address, which he gave in 1933.  So you can assume that the story takes place right around 1933 or 1934.  This was right at the height of the Great Depression, which factors into a lot of the plotline in the story (like how people have to pay Atticus with food instead of money sometimes).

With what high-ranking person does the narrator of "The Canterbury Tales" open his descriptions?

The Knight. Chaucer sets up the stall for the theme of class which is going to bubble throughout the Canterbury Tales:



Me thynketh it acordaunt to resoun
To telle yow al the condicioun
Of ech of hem, so as it semed me,
And whiche they weren, and of what degree,
And eek in what array that they were inne;
And at a knyght than wol I first bigynne.



Roughly translated, this quote might read as follows:



I think it's logical
To tell you how each person
Appeared and was, as it seemed to me,
And who they were, and of what class they were,
And also what clothes they wore
And therefore, with a Knight, I'll begin...



So right from the start, we're going to be judging by class, by clothes, and by appearance. And it makes sense to start with the person of the highest class (of course, the Host will also - likely - rig the story selection to let him go first) - the Knight.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

How do the animals in Animal Farm "contribute to their own oppression? Is this accurate?"The foolishness of the animals in the farm contribute to...

I think they were "foolish" in some ways, but I think it is foolishness that is more like gullibility, a type of foolishness, than anything like stupidity.  Old Major was a clever leader, and he had a vision that has impressed many people since the day of Karl Marx.  The intelligent and manipulative pigs were able to take the animals desire for a better life, and convince them that it was possible if they could get rid of their oppressor (Jones), and form their own society.  They were gullilble (foolish) when they believed that there could be a society without someone/animal in control.  Blinded by the vision, they were unable to see what the pigs were doing, unable to filter facts from propaganda, unable to see that the rules were changing almost as they read them, and willing to work for a future that would never come to pass.  

So their gullibility/foolishness certainly contributes to their opression.  But this is not surprising ... it has happened in many societies over the years, and may be happening today.

How can I compare the use of words in Bronte's Wuthering Heights and Dickens' Great Expectations? Words used in descriptions, insulting and...

You have asked a big question here, so I will focus on one area of interest to both novels which is the point of view in their narration. I think it is fair to say that if you are looking for some general differences, the style in terms of word usage and sentence structure is more complicated in Great Expectations, as Dickens uses a variety of different sentence lengths, at times having very long sentences, and also a wider range of vocabulary. Bronte has a more simplistic style that features less of a range of the aspects that Dickens utilises so ably.


However, considering point of view, on of the key aspects of style in Wuthering Heights is the confused narration that dominates the novel. The story is a story within a story, as Lockwood is the primary narrator, who narrates the tale that Nelly Dean tells him. At times, this is further confused, when Nelly narrates to Lockwood the tales that she herself has been narrated, such as Isabella´s escape from Wuthering Heights. Thus the narration is a kind of "chinese box" style of many different layers and levels, depending above all on the knowledge of Nelly Dean of the characters and events. A fascinating question though is to consider whether Nelly herself is a reliable narrator.


The narration in Great Expectations is a lot less complicated compared to Wuthering Heights, but it is still of interest. The form of first person retrospective narration is used, that allows an older, wiser and more mature Pip to look back and comment - often ironically or sadly - on his actions when he was younger. Thus we often have two accounts of events intermingled - the impressions of the younger Pip with his childish understanding, accompanied by a more mature and reasoned perspective. You might want to look at some of Pip´s conversations with Biddy to see how the younger Pip completely misunderstands and takes umbrage at what Biddy seems to be suggesting, whereas the older Pip is painfully aware of the younger Pip´s arrogance and snobbishness.

In The Giver, why did Jonas refer to Gabe as his little brother?

Even though Gabe and Jonas are not biologically related, or in the same family group, Jonas feels that the bond they have created is fraternal.  As Jonas learns more about the world around him, he discovers that the society he serves is a dystopian nightmare that slaughters the old and the unfit.  Jonas is losing his innocence, but he sees that innocence reflected in Gabe, who is not yet old enough to make these discoveries himself.  If they survive in the wilderness, Jonas will be able to teach Gabe the truths he has learned.  Thus, the evils of the community they left will not sully Gabe, and he can remain the innocent being he has always been.  As adopted children can attest, biology is not the sole link to a family; teaching and raising a child can also create this bond.  The family groups that society creates are shams of real family dynamics.  Jonas has the opportunity to break through the facade and truly connect to another human being.  As such, they are brothers.

What qualities determine the difference between skill and art in "Gathering Blue"?I don't get it - I need an answer asap!

I do not have the book "Gathering Blue" in front of me, but in general terms I can say that art has an element of expression in it that skill does not.  For example, if a person is skilled at making baskets, he would be able to make baskets that are sturdy and neat, and which serve their function efficiently.  If a basketmaker is artistic, that would indicate that his baskets would also have a quality of uniqueness; they might portray elements of a certain culture, or communicate feelings or aesthetic beauty.  Artistry usually goes hand in hand with skill, whereas skill does not necessarily always indicate artistry.

Some might say that skill is something that can be taught, whereas art is an innate talent or a gift given only to certain individuals Art also is closely associated with creativity, while skill is not, necessarily.  In "Gathering Blue", Kira learns the skill of weaving - how to manipulate the tiny threads carefully and neatly - from her mother.  She has a gift, however, which is recognized by her society, to imagine unique patterns of her own, and oftentimes her fingers, directed by inner inspiration which only Kira can hear, formulate beautiful designs never seen before.  Thomas, too, has the same gift in regards to carving.  Kira's and Thomas's skills have a higher, artistic dimension, making them artists instead of ordinary craftsmen.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

In Night, what eight words separate Elie and his family forever?

The Jewish community in Sighet, Hungary was oblivious of the danger posed by the ascension of the Nazi to power. Although they heard horror stories from beyond their region, of the atrocities meted against Jews. The Jews of Sighet chose to ignore these warnings until it was too late. Elie and his family resided in Sighet until the Hungarian police handed them over to the Gestapo, who transported them together with the other Jews to concentration camps.


Transport was arranged for the Jews who traveled from Sighet to Kaschau then to Auschwitz and finally to Birkenau, not sure of what awaited them at the camp. On arrival, the men were separated from the women. This would be the last time Elie saw his mother and sister, Tzipora. Eight words spoken by an SS officer separated Elie’s family forever.



An SS came toward us wielding a club. He commanded: "Men to the left! Women to the right!" Eight words spoken quietly, indifferently, without emotion. Eight simple, short words.


What made Lily angry in "The Giver"? What does she really feel instead of anger?This is all one question. That is how the teacher gave it to me.

Lily was "angry" at school earlier in the day because a group of Sevens from another Community came to join her Childcare group at the play area, and "they didn't obey the rules at all".  She was especially mad at one little boy who "kept going right to the front of the line for the slide, even though the rest of (the children) were all waiting".  Lily was so infuriated that she made a fist at the boy to express her displeasure.


Mother and Father talk to Lily about her feelings of anger, asking her to consider the possiblity that, in the visiting children's own Community, rules might be different; perhaps the children "simply didn't know what (Lily's group's) play area rules were".  Jonas encourages his sister to remember how she had felt when her group had visited other communities, and Lily admits she "felt strange...because their methods were different...(she) felt stupid".  Father says that might be precisely how the boy who angered her today might have felt; "strange and stupid, being in a new place with rules that he didn't know about".  Lily concludes that perhaps she is not angry after all.  In fact, she feels a little sorry for the boy, and is sorry that she made a fist at him (Chapter 1).


Later, when Jonas has a greater understanding about feelings because of his experiences with the Giver, he remembers this incident.  He realizes that Lily had not felt real anger - "shallow impatience and exasperation, that was all Lily had felt".  Jonas knows this "with certainty" because, now that he understands what real injustice and cruelty are, he himself has experienced anger and rage, and they are nothing like the "anger" that Lily thinks she felt on the playground. (Chapter 17).

Friday, May 3, 2013

In Oedipus Rex, what is the message from the oracle of Delphi?

Temple of Apollo: (Greek mythology) the oracle at Delphi where a priestess supposedly delivered messages from Apollo to those who sought advice; the messages were usually obscure or ambiguous.


Oracles In order to understand the will of the gods, the Greeks consulted oracles. These were places holy to a specific deity (often Apollo); humans could pose questions and the god would answer through a chosen intermediary. The most important oracle in the Greek world was Apollo’s temple at Delphi (also called Pytho, because legend said that it was founded when Apollo killed the previous resident, a giant snake, or python.). Here, Apollo answered questions through his priestess, the Pythia, who entered an ecstatic state and babbled out responses, which were in turn interpreted and delivered in verse by the priests. It was customary for kings and cities to consult the oracle of Delphi before making any big decision


The most important god for the Oedipus Rex is Apollo, whose oracle at Delphi gives the important prophecies to Oedipus and Creon (Laius was traveling to this oracle when he was killed). Apollo’s knowledge is absolute— if Apollo says something will happen, it will happen. His prophecies in this play, however, are not warnings: He does not tell Laius not to have children, merely that his child will kill him. He does not tell Oedipus to kill his father, but that he will kill his father. When Oedipus sends Creon to find out how to end the plague, Apollo tells them to drive the murderer of Laius out of Thebes, but this is not an instruction so much as a simple answer.

Why did European Imperialism grow in the late 1800s?Make sure to mention the countries that are involved in the act of imperialism.

Eurpoean Imperialism, where a country extends its influence and culture through trade, diplomacy, and military, had been steadily growing since the late 1400's, when countries started to acquire colonies. Colonies eventually became part of empires, Britain's being the largest and most affluent in the 1800's.  Before empires were built, however, the forces of Nationalism within various European states caused them to attempt to expand borders and commerce at the expense of their neighbors.  The rise of the British Empire in the mid 1800's and earlier, the expansion of France under Napoleon in the late 1700's, induced other European powers, notably Germany and Italy, to consolidate and develop their own brand of Nationalism, then acquire their own colonies as their own form of Imperialism. This competition among the major European Powers, inside and outside of Europe, finally resulted in major conflict in 1914 causing the First World War.  See more at the link:

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Who was the "mistake" in "The Westing Game"?Barney Northrup rented apartments in Sunset Towers to one tenant who was a "mistake" -- which one was it?

The tenant to whom Barney Northrup rented an apartment in Sunset Towers by mistake was Sydelle Pulaski.

Barney Northrup had carefully chosen whom he wanted to live at Sunset Towers.  Each of the potential tenants whom he then aggressively courted had some connection to Sam Westing.  It is not revealed until later which of the tenants was the "mistake" (Chapter 1), but throughout the Westing Game, Sydelle stuck out because no one could figure out her connection to the game's inventor.  Sandy McSanders, the doorman and one of the Westing heirs, compiled a notebook listing everything that was known about each of the players.  On Sydelle Pulaski's entry, he answered the section about her "Westing connection" with only a question mark (Chapter 18).  Later, Judge Ford uncovered a transcript of an interview with a childhood friend of Bertha Erica Crow, credited to a Sybil Pulaski (Chapter 19).

The "mistake" was caused by Otis Amber, a private investigator hired by Barney Northrup to investigate the six people originally sought as tenants for Sunset Towers.  They were supposed to be J.J. Ford, George Theodorakis, James Hoo, Gracie Windkloppel, Flora Baumbach, and Sybil Pulaski.  Sybil Pulaski was a close friend of Crow, who turned out to be Westing's ex-wife.  Amber mistakenly misread her first name, Sybil, and ended up investigating a Sydelle Pulaski instead (Chapter 26).

What is DNA?

DNA is deoxyribonucleic acid, and is contained in your body's cells. It is a double, long chain of molecules called nucleotides that tell each cell what proteins to make. The DNA itself makes up chromosomes. You have 23 pairs of chromosomes in your cells, and you inherited one of each set from one or the other of your parents.


Most DNA in humans is alike, from person to person, which is why we all look like people. But everyone's is also slightly different, so we are not all exactly the same. The DNA basically tells the cells what kinds of things to make; one part of DNA might code for the polypeptides to make red blood cells, for example, or for brain tissue.


DNA is the genetic material; it makes a starfish look like a starfish, and a pine tree look like a pine tree.

What do the flies in Lord of the Flies represent?Does "the flies" represent how people seem to be working together, but in reality they are all on...

The pig's head is the Lord of the Flies.  It represents anarchy.  It's also considered Beelzebub.  The flies could be considered the followers.  Just as Jack has finally split the boys into two tribes--the fire makers and the fire takers--his tribe members are like the flies.  They follow his orders.  They work together to accomplish his goals.


So they are working together, but they have a different agenda than the "right" one.  They are following Jack's leadership which is the "wrong" agenda.  They hover around death and decay--which is what is happening slowly on the island.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

How is Like Water for Chocolate an example of magical realism?

The origins of the sub genre of Magical Realism is attributed to Swiss-born essayist and writer Alejo Carpentier Valmont, who took residence in Cuba since infancy, and who considered himself a Latin American. He is one of the main influences of the most celebrated magical realism representatives, the Nobel Literature Prize Winner from Colombia, Gabriel García Márquez. 


Magical Realism consists on the use of creative license to include unlikely elements or situations into the narrative. These can be magic, supernatural powers, ghosts, and any other factor that will take a regular situation to a much higher level. Keep in mind that it is still meant to be "realistic", therefore do not confuse it with a "fantasy". The meaning of this is that it must remain a human story about human issues. The difference is that, with Magical Realism, the senses that all humans have (plus one more, the psychic component) will be intensified to the core.


In the case of Tita De La Garza, everything from her birth and throughout her life has been directly related to the supernatural: Her basket of sorrows, the salt of the tears when she was born, and the effects that her pent up emotional frustrations cause in her immediate environment.


Aside from this, notice other instances of realism which, through the agency of the supernatural and the magical, make reality all the more powerful and colorful by unveiling the deepest passions of the human being. 


Food, the conduit of it all, makes Tita different. She is not only a great cook but, similarly, a nurturer of people. She nurses her brother Roberto although she is a virgin and, as such, unable to produce any mother's milk. 


Gertrudis, a woman with a super high libido, exerts her passion in a way that, according to the story, the men can "smell" it. Sex, hunger, passion, anger, revenge, and pain are at the core of this story that shows how oppression turns you into a modern day slave, even of your own family. 

What are the components of a balanced diet at different life stages, and how does this contribute to an individual’s health?

The components of a basic diet do change through various stages of life. Infants, toddlers, teens, young adults, and mature adults all undergo biological changes which require different sets of nutrients, vitamins, minerals, and the three basic, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats. Scientists and health experts are continuously doing research to assess the bodily needs at these stages. An example would be the amount of calcium in one's diet. In infancy, milk it is a major factor in growth and development and continues until full maturity is reached. As we age, we lose the body's ability to utilize calcium and an increased intake of calcium and Vitamin D is needed after the age of fifty to prevent osteoporosis, a condition characterized by depleting bone density. More intake of dairy products (low in fat) are recommended. By researching each component listed above one can see the different stages the body needs.

What is the main function of the fool in "King Lear"? What is the secondly function?

The fool as a character is confusing, but part of this is the difference between the 1600s and today, as well as the difference in place. If...